Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widow Sunday (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Widow Sunday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet notability standards, only sourced by primary non-notable sources. Hoponpop69 (talk) 01:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 01:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my first AfD nomination on this article. GregJackP Boomer! 02:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find anything in the way of real independent coverage in reliable sources, and their short discography shows that none of their releases are on 'important' (by our definition) labels. Fails WP:BAND at present. — sparklism hey! 10:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' Don't forget to delete their albums too. Shii (tock) 13:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.