Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tannekill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted (G10) by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 06:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tannekill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some twitter play-on-words. No reference to this phrase elsewhere. Possibly A11 worthy. Stickee (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is ultimately a neologism that someone came up with one day. There's just enough people using it on Twitter to where it may pass WP:A11, but even so it's still pretty non-notable. I would, however, say that it's a pretty obvious attack page against Ryan Tannehill so I'll tag it as WP:G10. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that sports trash talk exists, but Wikipedia is WP:NOT a place to post this sort of thing as it comes across as an attack page- which is not tolerated. I do want to stress that even if this was re-written to be neutral (we can have pages on words that were meant to disparage), it still wouldn't pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.