Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supermegalith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supermegalith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this is a real term except maybe in the sources which are in Spanish. Contested PROD. Also, "possible hoax. The external link is dead and Google has never heard of the Asociación Latinoamericana de Paleoarqueología". — Jeff G. ツ 21:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am autor of Supermegalith, The website of our "Asociacion Latinoamericana de Paleoarqueología" is being created, we believe it is worth using the medium of wikipedia to define these new concepts.

Spanish-language references are valid: 1. "Inventario y Descripción de los Supermegalitos Hallados en el Perú" is a work protected by copyright. 2. While "Estudio de Cuencas Modificadas Culturalmente, Reconocimiento e Inventario de Obras Supermegalíticas halladas en el Perú" was presented at the last congress: "congreso Peruano del Hombre y la Cultura Andina y Amazónica" evaluated and approved by a technical committee scholar, in San Marcos University is the oldest university in all America and possibly the most prestigious of my country.

Therefore the references are valid and erudites. The "XVI Congreso Peruano del Hombre y la Cultura Andina y Amazónica" has an official website and you can corroborate the veracity of my information. Jun 19, 22:17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan L. Bacigalupo (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At this time. This article is being edited. we have a problem on the copyright of the images, in the coming days we will solve this problem, thanks. Jun 21, 22:20

Delete. Could even use {{db-context}} - insufficient information to identify subject - southern Peru is far too vague. An object "ten times longer than Mount Rushmore's" should show up on Google's satellite view. So where are the co-ords? The only refs. are papers by the author of the article. So we could say original research. Quite simply, no reliable evidence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 03:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails WP:GNG (no sources), WP:NOR and WP:MADEUP. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete for the above reasons, as well as the obvious WP:SPAM and COI problems. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.