Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soulcrusher (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Soulcrusher (Operator album). Tone 08:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soulcrusher (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since creation in 2008, and I can't see how this passes WP:NSONG. Merge and redirect to Soulcrusher (Operator album) as {{R from song}}, taking the hatnote with it but as {{redirect|Soulcrusher (song)|the song by White Zombie|Soul-Crusher (song)}}. (Soul-Crusher (song) is already an R from song.) Narky Blert (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - would the chart positions be able to establish notability if they were sourced? Foxnpichu (talk) 21:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• No. Chart positions are a good sign that a song might be notable, but notability is more so established by whether or not there is substantial coverage in third-party, reliable sources. Aoba47 (talk) 04:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• In that case, I'd say Delete. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh shoot. Why didn't I think of that? Redirect to Soulcrusher (Operator album). Foxnpichu (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Soulcrusher (Operator album): Barely found anything about the song. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Soulcrusher (Operator album) due to a lack of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources, but this is a viable search term so I feel like a redirect would be preferable over outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect seem appropriate until and unless some significant sources are found. Rlendog (talk) 14:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.