Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Arnold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, defaults to Keep. NawlinWiki 14:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Arnold

non notable Kripto 00:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Kripto 00:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the group article. Band looks to be somewhat notable in New Zeland although not sure that the individual himself is notable enough for a proper article and the lack of sources does not help either. Also, to the nom can you add more reasons for your nomination, because it is another reason why I haven't said simple delete .--JForget 00:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, fair point. What I meant to say was: this person is not notable by virtue of doing anything except being in a band that may squeak through notability guidelines, and that band already has a page. Keeping this article makes it incumbent on the authors of this page to create more for the remaining members of the band. Kripto 00:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the gaynz ref is one reliable source strictly about Arnold, not so much the rest of the band. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 08:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included on the LGBT Studies WikiProject page. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 08:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, he is notable, I would prefer more sources but what it has is enough. Callelinea 22:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment I just googled him, and I got this. a bunch of people who aren't him, a press release and some community theatre. In short, nothing much. I'd say that notability of his band (which i still dispute) is non-transferable. Kripto 23:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.