Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil elem schools
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Argao Central Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Elementary schools should be merged to their town articles given that they are not individually notable, such as in this case. Per WP:WPSCH/AG. Same reason for the following articles. Moray An Par (talk) 01:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don Mariano Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nemesio I. Yabut Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Moray An Par (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete after adding any pertinent information to the main article. OP should note that this is not for discussing mergers but deletions. However, while we're here... they don't seem to pass our notability guidelines on their own. If the articles are to be kept as redirects that is fine by me. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, by saying that, I only meant to cite the guideline, and stress that it doesn't deserve its own article. A merge and redirect can be an option, however, I would not prefer it myself for there isn't really much content in the articles that are worth integrating to their town articles. Moray An Par (talk) 08:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, sorry to misunderstand you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, by saying that, I only meant to cite the guideline, and stress that it doesn't deserve its own article. A merge and redirect can be an option, however, I would not prefer it myself for there isn't really much content in the articles that are worth integrating to their town articles. Moray An Par (talk) 08:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete after taking any useful content and thinking about it and then rewriting it in any locality article which applies. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to locality per usual practice. Please note, that after any content merge a straight deletion would breach our GFDL obligations. TerriersFan (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.