Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olle Westling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Olle Westling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't inherit notability from his son and he hasn't accomplished anything noteworthy on his own. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. WP:NOTINHERITED, and couldn't find SIGCOV on Westling not in the context of his in-laws.
Longhornsg (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's SIGCOV of Olle Westling it can still establish notability even if the coverage only exists due to his relation to famous persons.
The fact of having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG.
AlexandraAVX (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.