Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niyameddin Musayev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Niyameddin Musayev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I disagree with the respected @The Gnome that the artist is non-notable; however, the article is in a disastrous condition. Someone has to give it a new life with the proper content and sourcing.
Villon411 (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Though a negative (my "no sourcing") is rather difficult to formally prove, it is trivially easy to disprove. All one needs is the proferring of sources. Simple assertions "this is notable" won't do. -The Gnome (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - or perhaps draftify? I can't find anything, but maybe the sources are not in English. It would be nice if someone found something in a non-English language which met the GNG - and whilst I accept that there has been a lot of time for someone to do that, I'm open to draftify for a while to give another try. JMWt (talk) 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.