Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiplex Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 19:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplex Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. sst✈^(discuss) 10:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 10:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 10:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, The article fails WP:GNG. Looks like for PR. All the article created by the creator also looks like that.Josu4u (talk) 12:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - NN company, no proper sourcing, COI editors. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete definitely PR, no notable independent coverage. AddMore der Zweite (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now at best as there's hardly even much to suggest minimal general notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 12:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.