Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Claire Lim Moore
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marie Claire Lim Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertorialized WP:BLP of a writer and businessperson, not properly sourced as clearing our notability standards for either endeavour. Six of the seven sources here are primary sources (book sourced to its presence on Amazon, "staff" profiles on the websites of companies and organizations she's directly affiliated with, etc.) which are not support for notability at all, and the only reliable source is a listicle -- which means that source is fine for use but not in and of itself enough. As always, the notability test for writers and businesspeople is not simply that their own self-published web presence offers technical verification that they exist -- it requires them to be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG. People are not automatically notable just because they've given TEDx talks either. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I can see nothing noteworthy here.Strandvue (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.