Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of superstitions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Surprised this one was relisted! Missvain (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of superstitions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list would be endless and there's simply no criteria for this list. I have put this list into AfD after an RfD discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_10#List of superstitions. Thanks to Rosguill for WP:NPASR in the AfD nomination of this list. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 15:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 15:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I seriously doubt moral right of arguments against keeping this list article since Wikipedia has not done away with concept of Lists, Lists seem to serve ease of access and reading function to readers compared to templates and categories, for example Category:Indexes of religion topics has almost 12 list articles and such many does exist on Wikipedia, so why subject of Superstition can not have a list?
Bookku (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 02:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.