Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hybrid vehicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn after unanimous keep !votes. postdlf (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of hybrid vehicles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be hundreds of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. This doesn't fail either WP:INDISCRIMINATE or WP:LISTCRITERIA. Notability is blatant, the criteria for inclusion are well-defined, and it's easily reliably sourced. We don't go "oh there's hundreds of entries, we can't have a list!" as there are much longer cromulent lists out there. What this leaves is a set of arguments for deletion that are not; WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NEGLECT, WP:PLENTY, and WP:OUTDATED are just a start of the points relevant here. In short: there is no policy-based reason to delete this article, and no policy-based rationaile for deletion is articulated in the nomination, so therefore WP:SK1 should apply. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, No valid reason for deletion, the article can easily be maintained. JayJay^{What did I do?} 08:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I was unsure whether to close this via WP:BOLD or not. I'm going to also say Speedy Keep per the others, but maybe we could compensate by only including hybrid vehicles that have reasonable coverage? Foxnpichu (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean only include those with Wikipedia articles (there are over 200 articles so far) that sounds good and I agree and please go ahead and amend the lead and close. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I don’t think I can close the AfD since I’m involved. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep Encyclopedic subject. LearnIndology (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep valid navigational list article, plenty of blue links. Dream Focus 16:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per above. Nightfury 14:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Is there a way we can request an early close? I think it is clear that everybody wants this kept and it is very unlikely for somebody to !vote otherwise now. Foxnpichu (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.