Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipsha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lipsha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NALBUM states that unreleased albums notable enough for articles are few and far between - "a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects".

This album release may not even happen - it was reportedly canceled previously, and almost a year later nothing significant has surfaced. Possibly a WP:CRYSTAL violation since it might not even come out; NALBUMS also says that generally album articles should only exist when the title, track listing, and release date are all officially confirmed. So far only the title has been.

Furthermore, the two artists involved have previously collaborated multiple times outside of this planned project, and many of the sources just seem to support any collaborations they have done since 2012, regardless of whether or not they're for this record. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take another look at the article: It is still a chance for it to be released, so there is no need to delete just yet Thewormsplayer (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WP:WikiProject Alternative music and WP:WikiProject Pop music have been notified of this discussion to hopefully generate more discussion. –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON. I am also less than sanguine about the reliability of many of the sources such as Digital Spy. Certainly the twitter tweet should go. Seems to lack significant coverage in reliable sources for WP:GNG. Also runs afoul of WP:CRYSTALBALL. --Bejnar (talk) 05:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NALBUMS, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:TOOSOON. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 00:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.