Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalima Boarding School
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lalima Boarding School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable school, puff article. Sources provided appear to just be listings, so not SIGCOV, BEFORE didn't turn up anything else. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.