Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Yu-jae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yu-jae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater; no senior-level medal placements. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and South Korea. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

now she is the 2025 senior national bronze medalist Rainbowed-Sunned-Spirit (talk) 07:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment As she is active and has literally just won a medal, is Draftify an option if GNG cannot be found right now? It may be provable soon and it seems a shame to have to potentially recreate the article from scratch in the nearish future if it is deleted.Canary757 (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It really was created prematurely. But as she is scheduled to compete at the World Junior Championships this spring, let's speedy keep this AFD as "nominator withdrawn" for now, and if the results aren't notable, we can revisit this. Pinging Liz. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You can do that now I believe since nobody has voted delete. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't know how to do that. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This → [1] is enough for me. --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• You can search like this if you want: [2]. There's a lot more. (I found one good article, that's enough for me.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Here's one more article about her and her twin sister: [3]. --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.