Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumping Monks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping Monks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any significant coverage or other indication of notability. Lennart97 (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Two indie albums and a top 190 single don't make for notability via WP:MUSICBIO for an artist/band and they didn't attract significant coverage. LizardJr8 (talk) 16:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the music group, the single album charting at 190 on Billboard 200 isn't sufficient to demonstrate notability, when other criteria are not satisfied. --Ashley yoursmile! 15:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.