Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Seipelt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG^converse 07:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Seipelt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. No sources are provided. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• There are sources at fr:Joseph_Seipelt. Stevage 01:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Siepelt performed as a soloist at the première of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony in 1824. https://books.google.com/books?id=PySuF_weSCIC&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142&dq=%22Joseph+Seipelt%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=UuBO6-_wNl&sig=o1lpzow-en9XbRhwIEZo9wWqiI0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiDjb70oardAhWPyIMKHbH4CKcQ6AEwC3oECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Joseph%20Seipelt%22%20-wikipedia&f=false https://www.concerti.de/werk-der-woche/beethoven-sinfonie-nr-9/ http://www.milenio.com/cultura/la-muerte-de-la-sra-sontag-y-la-novena-de-beethoven Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As well, an article in a national biographical directory such as Biographisches Lexikon des Kaiserthums Oesterreich or Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon 1815–1950 (as shown in the corresponding German article) generally indicates notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – The nominator's concern about missing sources has been addressed. Notability is not in question. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Not withdrawing the nom as something else could potentially come up. Kirbanzo (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning you want for others find more sources? wp:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP. --Doncram (talk) 22:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, or "Speedy Keep". Even the nominator appears to concede the topic is notable. --Doncram (talk) 22:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. He has a lengthy entries in the both the Großes Sängerlexikon (which I've added to the references) and Österreichisches Biographisches Lexikon 1815–1950. This AfD is a clear case of BEFORE not being followed. Voceditenore (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 23:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.