Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guaranteed price moving
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
29 unique Googles, creator has no history other than this article and linking it and its website to other articles. No evidence of meeeting WP:CORP, advertorial tone. The oly sources are the company's website and an entry which "has either been provided by the company, or has been compiled by the Bureau from other sources." Just zis Guy you know? 12:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Clearly fails WP:CORP Lurker talk 12:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it's spam. Fry it up with Ketchup and we may have a sandwich, an encyclopaedia article we have not. WilyD 13:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; spam. —Ben FrantzDale 16:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & 50% of Wiki; Have you looked at Moving_Companies Moving_companies Category ? Its no better or worse then every other site in this category... Before you light the flame-thrower on one site ... look at the whole cat.. whats this place turning into dmoz? Becuase its not one of your own contribs you light a torch? --160.79.75.254 20:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Feel free to nominate any or all of the articles in that category. Heaven knows there's a few pieces of spam floating around, inspiring similes comparing Wikipedia to a university residence stew. WilyD 20:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lets See... Commercial Spam 100% commercial nothing useful , Wiki SpamMelt , Double Dipping Spam , Spamtastic , How Many Here for Sirva? , I mean really of all the sites here NONE really have anything other then commercial interests at heart... the one in question is no exception but at least they offer some guides and how-to's... the only item of merit here I see is Assoc. Definitions --160.79.75.254 22:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.