Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germantown High School (Mississippi)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Germantown High School (Mississippi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citations, non-notable, created with the purpose of defamation (please check the history, since I removed that part). Writing Enthusiast ^☎ 16:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Given the brief and unpleasant edit history, and the still-minimal state of the article, WP:TNT might be suitable here. An article is certainly possible for this high school, which was founded in 2011 and now has 950 students,[1] and has already won at least one state championship (in band).[2] --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the WP:HEY work by Gene93k and Arxiloxos. A verified secondary school with 950 students. The article is nothing like the condition when the nom AfD's this, which by the way was only eight minutes after the article was created.[3] Improvement was in order, not AfD.--Oakshade (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, now that constructive content has been added to the article, it probably makes more sense to keep it, and if necessary the offensive content that was in earlier versions could be revdel'd. --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As a high school per long standing precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES]]. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a high school. No reason to think that with local and hard copy searches sources cannot be found to meet WP:ORG. We keep high schools for very good reasons; not only do they influence the lives of thousands of people but they also play a significant part in their communities. Expansion not deletion is the way to go with such stubs. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep high schools are generally notable.-- danntm ^T _C 02:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep High schools are generally kept per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 06:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it's snowing in Mississippi. Bearian (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - By longstanding consensus, high schools of confirmed existence are presumed notable in the same way that towns, rivers, mountains, and interstate highways are presumed notable. Carrite (talk) 17:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I have rewritten the piece, no TNT needed. Carrite (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.