Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolver Music Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evolver Music Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company with no sources provided to back up claims. Tinton5 (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly put award-winning and corrected since Betty Moon was actually nominated for multiple awards while on A&M/Universal records. This is now fixed, and all citations, links and relevant stats have been added to back the relevancy of the label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbobbradley123 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Betty Moon: fails WP:NCORP and WP:NMUSIC. I can only find ten releases by the label, all of which are Ms Moon's own output. Of the references added by Mrbobbradley123, two fail to mention Evolver Music at all, three are simply "released on the Evolver Music label" passing mentions, and the only even vaguely noteworthy reference is the Soundgirls blog, in which Ms Moon writes her own article and uses it to plug her label, so it's a primary source. No evidence that this label has any notability beyond its founder. Richard3120 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Looks like another case of a self promoting company (links at bottom use words like "official") --Sau226 (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.