Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electroshock weapon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 09:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Electroshock weapon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an obvious copy of Taser PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is definitely not a direct copy. There is duplicate information which should be merged one way or another, not just deleted. This article is also much more in depth and longer than that of the taser article. Deletion is not the solution for this issue, should be a merging proposal. Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  how do you propose a merge??? PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @PaulGamerBoy360 Read this here WP:MERGEPROP. I feel this one would need a discussion before merging. Paulpat99 (talk) 03:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Tasers aren't the only kind of Electroshock Weapon. The articles also aren't copies; while they share a lot in common, and could share a lot of information, Taser is specific while Electroshock Weapon is broad. - AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 16:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.