Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipping (Dip Snapping)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dipping (Dip Snapping)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN neologism. Sir Arthur Williams (talk) 03:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited it down to fit with what is acceptable it seems. It explains the neologism a bit more than UD. I don't know if it is enough for it to stay though. Do as you will. PS: By a simple Google search, it seems a Mr. Sir Arthur Williams needs a life outside his mother's basement. ;3 Mashew (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We do not consider Urban Dictionary entries to constitute reliable sources, needed to establish notability. Sir Arthur Williams (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Search results such as [1] obviously aren't usable sources, either. Sir Arthur Williams (talk) 05:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if no better source than Urban Dictionary can be found. JIP | Talk 07:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom — Deon ^talk
Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 14:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO and nominator. Can always be reintroduced later if evidence of notability becomes available. -- The Anome (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that this is a notable term; as noted, above, additional sources would be required, and I'm not finding any. The concept of tapping the Dip Canister (as this gesture imitates) might have a place in the Dipping tobacco article, but this term is not a useful redirect - so, delete. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per original tagger. Fails WP:NEO. E Wing (talk) 03:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NEO; it's possible that it might merit inclusion in the future, but due to WP:CRYSTAL, that will be for us to decide when/if it gets to that point. Cocytus [»talk«] 01:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.