Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denzil Connick
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Denzil Connick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep WP:SOLDIER is an essay with no official standing or consensus support. The nomination's claim that the subject does not pass the WP:GNG is false. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep fails WP:SOLDIER but the aggregate coverage of him probably amounts to SIGCOV in multiple RS sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Weak as I am AGFing User:Mztourist's argument that there is some coverage. Sadly, I am not seeing it. Could you link to the best examples? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing is not even close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GNG is not satisfied. Sparse, weak media coverage, e.g. Blackwood Armed Forces veteran's 26 years helping others like him in a newspaper with a indeterminate subscription base, Denzil Connick remembers meeting Baroness Thatcher, from the BBC, but an interview and more about Thatcher than him. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per all noted above. Oaktree b (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.