Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dearly Departed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dearly Departed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band lacking reliable sources » Swpbτ • ¢ 03:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —» Swpbτ • ¢ 03:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I hate common terms like this; of the millions of hits, all I've seen are people using the term to describe a lost loved one. I have yet to see even a passing mention of the band. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Meets WP:BAND criterion #1, with significant coverage in Newsday. I've added five citations. The review from Scene Point Blank also represents some third-party coverage; from what I can tell, it's a legit music magazine, neither a single person's blog, nor a site of user-generated content. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Paul Erik. Chester Markel (talk) 05:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per Paul.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Looks like it meets the General Notability Guideline. Qrsdogg (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.