Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The 2006 AfD nomination calling this original research was obviously correct on the merits. Unlike other comparison articles, for which there is often good sourcing (as niche publications may have deep dives within a topic area), this only compares two products, almost exclusively with primary sources that only mention one of the products. Mach61 11:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mach61 11:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No reason for us to have a page for this, and it was only kept because of Wikipedia at the time basically being the wild west. λ NegativeMP1 21:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.