The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom I bet if they listed sources the content would be verifiable. They didn't. Unfortuantely, it reads like orginal research-- somebody's term paper. It feels like they coined the term. (I have some really mediocre essays on my webpage. If anyone wants to be bored. No neologisms, though.) :) Dlohcierekim05:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
