Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article 14

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article 14

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced compilation album that has no WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:NALBUM. cyberdog958^Talk 22:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. cyberdog958^Talk 22:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is the only coverage I could find, and it is insubstantial beyond basic press release-derived info. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It was for a good cause, but except for the brief announcement found by the previous voter, I can find no reliable reviews or other significant coverage. It only ever appears as a minor entry in the histories of some of the musicians who contributed, and those are just brief and uninformative listings themselves. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 19:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 19:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.