Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquiles Delle Vigne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aquiles Delle Vigne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty much lifted verbatim from the official web pages of Aquiles Delle Vigne. Subject is probably worthy of an article per notability guidelines, but the article does not provide the necessary citations to document this. Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The material used is promotionally worded: "prestigious Grand Prix" "vast discography" "leading teacher" and so on. The material may have a Wikipedia-compatible license but that doesn't mean it meets content policies. I recommend WP:TNT—it's probably better to start from scratch with original material, rather than taking freely-licensed but promotional material from elsewhere. RainCity471 (whack!) 19:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.