Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie A-Bomb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Annie A-Bomb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long term unsourced BLP. Obvious COI issues. Not much of a claim to notability. Very little coverage found - these were about it: Philadelphia Weekly, NBC Philadelphia. Michig (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Anna Frangiosa. Not sure it's a COI. It didn't have her real name, Anna Frangiosa, which I just added. Anna Frangiosa is a theater and costume director, Annie A-Bomb is her burlesque stage character. There are additional sources: Philadelphia Inquirer, South Philly Review, City Paper, City Paper, City Paper (Cover story on Anna Frangiosa). Her about page shows a more serious artistic background with additional press coverage of her works. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the coverage is generally very local and much of it is more about the troupe/shows than about Anna Frangiosa/Annie A-Bomb. --Michig (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Philly is one of the largest metro areas in the USA so local is a matter of interpretation, plus the amount and quality of sourcing weighs. There is significant coverage to write an article with per WP:WHYN. The coverage of her works is relevant per WP:ARTIST, at least the ones where she played a major role like director, or lead actor. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I tend to focus on general notability guidelines about coverage than localization. She's been covered extensively in multiple reliable secondary sources like (many overlap with Green's findings) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] SarahStierch (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also support the renaming to her real name. SarahStierch (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Green Cardamom and SarahStierch. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.