Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Constance Grey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Constance Grey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Delete See above (Allen Williamson Grey). Individual is the wife of a marginally notable baronet; no other information. Choess 06:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak merge. As the wife of the marginally notable baronet mentioned, she should also be mentioned within the baronet's article, with basic information provided. -- saberwyn 07:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Baronets' wives are a dime a dozen. This looks like an A7 speedy to me. -Doc^g 12:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Jyothisingh 14:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one of the baron's three wives. Important info is already in the baron's article. Ultra-Loser ^{[ T ] [ C ]} 15:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Being mentioned in a complete book of peerage is just a directory listing or passing reference and is not sufficient to justify an article in Wikipedia. Does not satisfy WP:BIO. Edison 15:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems to me she passes Wikipedia:Notability (royalty), specifically "Nobility.

British Peers and holders of courtesy titles (i.e. heirs apparent), as well as those holding the Scottish substantive title of "Master" or "Mistress" given to heirs are automatically notable, as are their spouses."Jcuk 22:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A baronetisn't a peer, so no she doesn't.--Doc^g 23:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not notable. The proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (royalty) clearly states spouses are not inherently notable, even if a Baronet was a peer. As a lesser noble the same guideline says even the holder of the title must meet WP:BIO in another way to be notable. Nuttah68 14:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.