Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"The Lansky"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of it. Glans at the Google results; the internet is earily silent on the matter. ...and I can't think of a lame pun for "neologism". Opabinia regalis 04:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. ... WTF ... Rangek 04:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as obvious neolo-jism. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I knew someone could do it. Opabinia regalis 01:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete — nonsense Betacommand 05:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete --FastDbz12 18:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Why hasn't it been deleted yet? FancyPants 20:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Think I heard it recently. --Nickjameson35 00:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete — protologism; please ejectulate this --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 00:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and pass the Q tips. NawlinWiki 01:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I can't help but hope that the above (top) user's usage of the word "glans" (rather than "glance") was unintentional. If so, the pun seems even more delicious. --24.141.162.250 01:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.