User talk:Zzguitar14

Hello, Zzguitar14! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Icseaturtles★ 04:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Haha! Yeah we're not supposed to use a page's talk/discussion page as a forum. But we can use user talk pages as a forum if we must. Your talk page is just somewhere to contact you, people just get pissed off and abuse me on mine usually hehe. So what single were you wanting next? k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 03:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's up to you really. Some ppl prefer to keep it on one page, doesn't bother me because i'll Watch your talk page. So no biggy. You've been pretty active lately. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 06:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Well, I visit Wikipedia every day for information on entertainment, hah. I'd say I'd want them to release Restless Heart Syndrome, East Jesus Nowhere, !Viva La Gloria!, and Before the Lobotomy. I know that would mean they'd release six singles and all, but those, imo, are some of the best choices for singles as they seem the most broadly appealed. --Zzguitar14 (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I do. I can't see them releasing anymore than four, this album hasn't done anywhere near as well as American Idiot... and that only had five singles. I think I'm sticking with Before the Lobotomy. :) k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 05:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any of these other songs surpassing that success though. Especially using something like Viva la Gloria, which is largely plot-based on the album's story. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 05:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you say that, added something just yesterday to the CD Single article about how in Australia, where I am, there's basically nothing in the way of CD singles anymore. To base a single's success in this day and age on "the people", is a bit naive. It's all big business nowadays - if they want to make a single big, then they'll spend the dollars to get it out there, and it will become big. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 06:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no the UWC is not a reliable chart. It's criteria doesn't at all cover the World, just not satisfactory. Check out Wikipedia:Record charts, should tell you all the information you need. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 02:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]