User talk:Z.E.R.O./Archive 3

The template links directly to the home page. See the link!

	This is a logo of a Mozilla product, and is protected by copyright and/or trademark by the Mozilla Foundation and/or its subsidiary Mozilla Corporation. It is believed that the non-confusing and non-disparaging use of images on the English-language Wikipedia, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary is compliant with the Mozilla Trademark Policy. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Logos. Use of the logo here does not imply endorsement of the organization by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor vice versa. Despite permissions granted by the Mozilla Foundation, this work is non-free by Wikimedia's Definition of Free Cultural Works, and therefore it may only be used in accordance with Wikipedia:Non-free content. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Z.E.R.O./Archive_3 true
To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. This tag is not sufficient on its own. Please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. Template:Non-free use rationale logo may be helpful for stating the rationale. Regarding uses other than in the original article: A detailed non-free use rationale is required for every article the logo is used in. Check the non-free use criteria and do not assume that existing rationales can be simply copied and pasted, as they may not necessarily apply. Do not use this template for Mozilla's products which are licensed freely under Mozilla Public License. Use {{MPL}} instead if free. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

I reverted your revert, because Essjay's user talk page clearly states:

"Do not, under any circumstances, remove posts from this page without my permission. Non-vandalism posts, regardless of merit, should not be removed or reverted; anyone observing the removal of information from this page by anyone other than myself should blanket revert on sight"

Please respect his wishes on this matter. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an addendum to this, applying generic warnings to the talk pages of well-established users, as you did here, is very likely to be interpreted as condescending, because these templates are designed for new and uninformed users (e.g., "welcome to wikipedia"). Because of this it is usually unproductive to add generic warnings; if you feel a message is in order, a personal note tends to be more effective. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... for the revert of my talk page. Appreciate it :) - Alison^<talk> 02:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are among many who have complained of my signature. I have finally decided to change it. However, I'm not sure what I should change it to, as my last design (my current one) seems to be very.... unpopular. If you wish to submit a design, I would be more than glad to use it. Thanks! -- S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 04:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Vandalism

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism

This is unacceptable use of a vandalism warning. Graft's edit to the article removed a garbled section (most of which was unrelated to "Conservation status"). He did not, however, remove any information from the article. Graft's edits clearly improved the article. Calling something vandalism that was not only a good faith edit, but also an improvement to the article, is ridiculous. Don't do that in the future. Guettarda 12:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just link in User:Ali-oops/Userpage for your own userpage??? Awesome :) I'm honoured! - Alison^☺ 01:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the header says. – Chacor 17:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current length of your sig in code is far too long - it takes up four to five lines of the editing box. Again, please reduce the size. – Chacor 04:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have criticized about my current signature, this sig from now on will look like this: Meteoroid »

—Meteoroid » 05:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's better, and looks cleaner. Thanks. (P.S., see WP:SIG#Length for why I asked you to shorten it.) – Chacor 05:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar! Andre (talk) 21:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Meteoroid. Just bumping you up in the queue to thank you (a) for you support in my RfA, and (b) for putting in that nice userbox which I totally forgot about this morning! Thank you on both counts, much appreciated, and keep up your good work! Bubba hotep 23:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qxz, you made this ad? —Meteoroid » 03:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the one at the top of my talk page? Yes, I made it (or rather them – there's six; click the "show another" button to randomize it). Any suggestions for additional ones are welcome – Qxz 03:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx, now i have my version of ur ad. u will see it on both my userpage and my talkpage. Meteoroid » 03:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one other thing – I see you've copied the code into your userspace. Could you possibly transclude {{User:Qxz/ad.css}} directly? That way changes will be reflected in your version too; since it's a CSS page your talk page is safe from vandalism :) – Qxz 03:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion done. Meteoroid » 03:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: I am using {{User:Meteoroid/ad.css}} because the link in "feedback" adds comments to ur talkpage instead of my talkpage. Meteoroid » 03:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... so it does. Well, I *did* make the ads, so I figured comments should come to me. But if you're happy to have them, I'll make it use the talk page of the user whose page it's on. Also, the "show another" link wasn't working properly with subpages, and you have it in a subpage on your userpage, so I've fixed that too. Thanks – Qxz 03:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, when you've done that, which is your favourite? :) And is there anything else you can think of that would benefit from an ad? – Qxz 03:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see you found my talk archive header, too. I was considering making it into a template – and perhaps now is a good time to do so, as you'll notice the "current talk page" link on your archive pages now points to my talk page :) Any suggestions as to what I should call it? – Qxz 03:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and created it, at {{talkarchive-atn}}. I've therefore updated your /Archive 1 accordingly – and it now links to your talk page rather than mine. Now it's a proper template, feel free to use it anywhere you wish. I've also switched your talk page back to using {{User:Qxz/ad.css}} – two reasons: First, if I update it with new ads, this means it will update on your talk page too. Otherwise, your talk page wouldn't reflect the changes and since you had it in a CSS page, I wouldn't be able to edit it to update it manually either. It's not too much of a problem when there's only you using it, but if you imagine lots of people start using it, and they all end up with out-of-date versions, it would be annoying for me :) Secondly, it's now possible to customize the border and background to fit the page it's applied to – it can be displayed in different styles without having to use a different template. You'll see I've changed it on this page to better fit your blue, rounded-edges colour scheme – like it? – Qxz 04:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanx, 'm now tagging {{User:Meteoroid/ad.css}} for speedy deletion. —Meteoroid » 13:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature is inappropriate and distracting, please change it to the default. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.189.189.23 (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Having griped earlier up the page about his old sig, I think his current one is fine. I'd ask the anon to read WP:SIG. – Chacor 03:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have recieved over 25,000 edits in only 2 months, it is possible that i will nominate you for RfA in the next few months (sometimes, I will nominate users simutaniously). —Meteoroid » 03:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you and half the rest of the wiki, judging by similar comments I've recieved. I'm still not entirely sure I want to be an administrator. Anyway, about that image, someone insisted I replaced all the non-animated GIFs with PNGs, so I did. Hence GIFs 4 and 5 have been deleted, so the template may have been broken temporarily. Should be OK now though – Qxz 06:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...so...... is the software that u r using ready to be released yet? —Meteoroid » 13:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're desparate to get hold of it, aren't you? I'll see what I can do over the next few days – Qxz 00:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange things to my sandbox.....I'm not objecting, that's what it's there for, but who is Spam moi? --Niroht | Smoke signals 04:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh and one other thing, is the software cross-platform compatible? (i.e. Windows, Linux, Mac, etc.) —Meteoroid » 03:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's written in Visual Basic.NET, so it only works on Windows. (It's the only programming language I'm any good with, unfortunately, and it was only intended to be for personal use) – Qxz 10:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have agreement that the user, Weixiang7326 has been vandalized for misinformation in the article, Windows Vista, and also it replaces their Windows screenshots with copyright material images of the TV Animé show, "Doraemon" and it uses the Royale theme in Windows XP. Have a look at his contributions, for example, Meteoroid -- I notice when I'm not created an account to Wikipedia last year, I see that mistyped the information to the Windows Vista article (as well to the minimum requirements), and replacing the Windows fair-use images, such as Windows XP and Windows Media Player, I found that maybe an adult content. I left a final warning at the Weixiang7326's talk page -- and if he continue to replace the inappropriate screenshots to the article, report Weixiang7326 to the administrator and will be blocked permanently from editing Wikipedia. Thanks! Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 01:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for commenting me! But no thanks to revert the older image version by you on Image:Windows Media Player 11 XP.png, because I demonstrating the Windows Vista theme for Windows XP, and the desktop background -- is part of the Microsoft Windows itself. It maybe that my latest version of the image is appropriate screenshot, either. Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 02:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i really do not know if that image IS appropriate to use and like i have said before, please archive your talk page, it's becoming too long. —Meteoroid » 02:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done to archive my talk page! Oh, and also I'm redesigned by talk page! Have a look, Meteoroid! I'm using a color scheme of the Codename: Kids Next Door cartoon which is credited for the KND logo. What do you think? Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 05:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

........... —Meteoroid » 05:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... you make my talk header as a template! Thanks a lot, Meteoroid! Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 05:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Meteoroid » 05:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recently asked me shouldn't you be nominated as administrator at this point? Is this a nomination - if so, I think I would accept!

anthonycfc ^[talk] 23:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.... —Meteoroid » 23:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You joined Wikipedia last year, so you should have been an administrator right now. —Meteoroid » 23:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But is this a formal nomination? If so, you might wish to speak to my Admin Coach, The Transhumanist; and if it is, thank you so much!

anthonycfc ^[talk] 23:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meteoroid! I don't want to sound like I'm censoring you or telling you off, but I don't know if this sort of message is very nice - I noticed you left one on Chacor's page too. Trust me, when someone is on RfA, they're checking it every so often, so they know if thye're passing or failing - and the way you phrase it sounds, well, kinda mean. Maybe a recommendation to withdraw, politely, something along the lines of "It looks like your request is unlikely to reach consensus. Have you considered withdrawing?" would probably be a bit nicer. Thanks, and I hope you don't take offense. Cheers, – riana_dzasta 09:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just stopping by to say thanks a bunch for supporting my Rfa which passed successfully on saturday, I am honoured to serve the community. Anyway keep up all your good work Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1]
Please don't leave people messages telling them they'll be blocked indef when they're clearly not going to be. Thanks. – Steel 18:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... new name? :-) I got the WMP 11 XP screenshot fully protected and I started up a discussion on the talk page so we can find a resolution to this problem. As someone who's been involved with the issue, your thoughts would help. See: Image talk:Windows Media Player 11 XP.png#Protected. Thanks. -/- Warren 17:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add these to your ad:
Sign your posts on talk pages.
Counter-Vandalism Unit

—zero _{(formerly User:Meteoroid)} 02:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your suggestions; I'll see what I can do. I'll do one for talk page signing, however I'm not sure about this "counter vandalism unit" because I haven't quite figured out what it is. It just seems to be a page telling you how to revert vandalism (which is redundant to the information on the official policy page and the Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism help page), and giving you a userbox with a nice logo to put on your page; I've dealt with a lot of vandalism without even having heard of this page before, so I'm curious as to what there is to advertise. Thanks – Qxz 02:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures – Qxz 03:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to make an ad that represents joining for the Counter-Vandalism Unit? zero » 00:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so... it's just I still don't really understand what the 'counter-vandalism unit' is. Is it just a group of people who do RC Patrol a lot? Is there a separate WikiProject page somewhere that lists members or something? The page you link just seems to be an information page, and I wouldn't do an ad just for an information page, though I'll happily do an ad for the concept of RC Patrol in general – Qxz 00:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - User:68.39.174.238‎ has consistently requested that no user page be created (I think the point is not all redlinked anons are assholes). I've deleted it (again). -- Rick Block (talk) 01:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that you already have those pages in your userspace. Would you like the old ones deleted? =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop tagging obvious vandal username blocks. pschemp | talk 03:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am having a little trouble starting my user page. How do you start a table of contents for your page??? Like you see at the top of most article discussion pages??? If yous ould help that would be great.GoldenIrish 17:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)GoldenIrish[reply]

Oh, do you mean the TOC on my talk page, I believe this is the code to use:

<div id="talk" style="text-align:center; padding:5px; clear:both;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="width: 200px; float: right; margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 4px; -moz-border-radius: 
10px;">
<div class="NavHead" style="padding: 1px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; text-align: center; 
margin-bottom: 4px;">Table of Contents</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="background: none;">
<div style="height: 200px; width: 200px; overflow: auto; font-size: 85%;">
__TOC__</div></div>

<inputbox>
type=comment
width=30px
default=User talk:GoldenIrish
buttonlabel=Leave a message
</inputbox>
</div>

zero » 18:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning (GMT time); every Wikipedian decides it's time to leave at some time or another, so I'm not going to bombard you with pleas to stay.

Instead, let me just say, you will be missed, and your contributions have been invaluable. If a day comes when you return, it will be one of gladness.

Kindest regards,
anthonycfc ^[talk] 01:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded! Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 01:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why your going on a break? Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 19:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you explain why you are trying to impersonate commons:User:NSLE-Chacor? Angela. 07:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realize that using the same username as other people in other wikis would cause impersonation. I thought there was not any rule for using the same username until now. zero » 12:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As stated at Wikipedia:Username policy - "attempts to impersonate other legitimate editors... may be blocked indefinitely... It is recommended that users not edit under multiple usernames, unless they have a very good reason. See Wikipedia:Sock puppet." Angela. 13:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would also think that an experienced user like you, Z.E.R.O. would be able to figure that out without Angela having to tell you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you tell me how do you monitor such stuff [2]?--Vaya 11:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky MSDN Academic Alliance Microsoft Office Update Media Player Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer MSN Explorer Mystic Ruins XPLite Microsoft Mail Sammy Drechsel .500 S&W History of the Netherlands Antilles Microsoft Visio Microsoft Campus Agreement The Sickness SBTVD Windows Calendar Microsoft Developer Network Microsoft Money

Cleanup LAN Manager DirectSound Badnik Merge Acer (company) Network Neighborhood Studies related to Microsoft Add Sources Chaos Emerald Microsoft Live Meeting Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection Wikify Haridwar University of Edinburgh School of Law Pendar Expand OGRE Engine Cricket 2005 History of Belize

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You left me a message on my talk page about the Uw-warn template {{uw-warn}}. Is there anything wrong with the template in question, or is there some twinkle-functionality related question you wanted to ask me, as I have trouble understanding the given message you gave me. _→AzaToth 00:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the thought, but you're a little (a year) late. :p Blast 21.03.07 1244 (UTC)

Thank you for the revert. Xiner (talk, email) 16:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see you're back, zero! Don't leave us soon :) — anthony^[cfc] 22:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whether I warn vandals often depends on the exact kind of vandalism. The more childish the edit (writing a fun paragraph -> blanking -> poop), the more likely I decide that it's probably not worth the while to warn them, as it seems to me like a form of feeding the trolls. But I admit that sometimes I'm just too lazy to do it. I'll keep your suggestion in mind. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to add that now that I have finally discovered WP:TW, my warning percentage may increase significantly. I basically never left warnings from VP, instead changed to firefox for that. Tedious, but no more. Regards, —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't get what you want me to do. I have moved all those pages for you, and they retain the old history. =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandal fighting skills have surpassed by users Curps and Omicronpersei8. I consider nominating you for admin in a few months. zero » 00:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are the second person to say that in four hours. Please, at least take the trouble to read the rest of my talk page before saying such a thing – if not the archives, where there are several such requests. Each one of them is going to get the same answer: No, I do not want to be an administrator. Comparing me to two users who left months ago also demonstrates little and if anything is insulting to them. Thanks – Qxz 19:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thanks! zero » 03:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know :) - as you may be aware, one somtimes doesn't have the time to apply the appropriate warning, especially when (as is often the case for me) you spot a bit of vandlaism on your watchlist just before you go out! Can I ask exactly which edit you were referring to? I have, as you may know, knowlegde of the appropriate warning guidelines, but sometimes it can be impractical to follow them, though I do try to adhere. The thing is - the only vandalism I have recently reverted is to MartinBot's user page, and I tend to block when that occurs (personal attacks). When I'm actively on RCPatrol, I always warn religiously, however if I'm making a casual revert, it's often difficult (in any case, admins should look through the user's contribs before blocking - not just the vandalism warnings (from experience)). I really don't want to be one of those who comlains about this sort of thing, but I admit to having felt slightly affronted by a message given to new users appearing on my talk page, while a short, personal notice would have sufficed. I have demonstrated in the past that I know the policy! Martinp23 22:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, if I started rambling, the moral is - "avoid slapping templates on the talk pages of established users/admins" :) Martinp23 22:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...is this you? zero » 00:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not me. And since it was created over a year ago and has fewer than 50 edits, I also fail to see how it is "similar" in anything but name. I also find this an assumption of bad faith on your part; by that logic, I could accuse you of being a sockpuppet of User:Zero R – Qxz 00:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no; I have changed my username from Meteoroid to Z.E.R.O. at Wikipedia:Changing username and I have been using this username for only 10 days. I do not know if is acceptable to change usernames more than 3 times. zero » 00:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can change usernames as many times as you wish (at least, if a bureaucrat approves the change; I imagine they'd begin to get annoyed if you requested them too often). Thanks – Qxz 00:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but it is not mine. I only have one and will only ever have one. Big Boss 0 02:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a sockpuppet of User:Ockenbock. -- The Hybrid 03:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you have to do; I'm not an admin. Just talk to Metros232 about it first, as he is the admin who has to deal with this guy almost daily. -- The Hybrid 04:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I agree. -- The Hybrid 04:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother issuing multiple "last warnings" to vandals. It just provokes them and they have fun pissing you off. Just report it quietly to WP:AIV and keep on reverting them until they're blocked. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've been putting it off because...who knows why, but thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 01:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you request an edit, please do not replace the {{permprot}} with {{editprotected}}. Instead, you should put {{editprotected}} in a new section with your request. Cbrown1023 talk 16:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Sidebar: Where? Cbrown1023 talk 17:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where in that section? :) Cbrown1023 talk 17:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind,  Done. Cbrown1023 talk 17:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Care to explain how 210.213.104.74 (talk · contribs) is a sock of anyone based on his one edit to Sound Connections? Metros232 03:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please look here. it is an abusive sockpuppet of Jigs41793 zero » 03:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All you've proven with that link is that the IP address is from the Phillippines. Many people live there. I hardly think that the edit of that IP proves that it is Jigs41793 AND that it is abusive. Metros232 03:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not using that IP address. Take a look its contributions. Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 12:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a guy of few words. Thanks for the nom. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 00:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is really none of my business and I don't want to bother you, but I wondered why, as the nominator, you wouldn't support Philip Gronowski's RfA? I suppose you simply forgot? —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, zero! I'm fighting vandalism using Vandal Fighter -- so that I will not vandalized again. Jigs41793 ^Talk/_contribs 01:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For this :-) Max ^{- You were saying?} 06:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted a good faith edit, which I have reverted back. Please review your edits more carefully in the future. Thank you. --Edokter (Talk) 11:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your changes to Qxz's user page. While I'm sure that it was meant to be taken as a helpful gesture, the addition of a large, dramatic "RETIRED" slogan should be left to the user page owner's discretion. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This RfA was withdrawn two days ago. I've removed your oppose opinion since once an RfA has been withdrawn it should not be added to. Thanks, Gwernol 01:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. As long as a withdrawn RfA is no longer transcluded on WP:RFA it is not active. A formal close does not have to occur. Generally people only add their opinions to RfAs that they find by looking at the RFA page, so this isn't a problem. Gwernol 01:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get that idea of hidden text at the top of your talk page from my userpage?  ~Steptrip 02:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first text that you can see between <!----> if you click on the "edit this page" button.  ~Steptrip 02:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that page, and this one.  ~Steptrip 02:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You just changed the Thanks, Steptrip to Cheers, z.e.r.o., correct? Just so you know, I am not in any way mad at you, just in case you were thinking that.  ~Steptrip 02:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's how mine is formatted, so they are the same. Aha on my behalf.  ~Steptrip 02:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]