User talk:Twixister

You're Aretha fanclub please stop delete Tina Turner data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.232.214.216 (talk) 19:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Twixister, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ike and Tina Turner family.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Malcolm X shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Softlavender (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I was a bit curt in my dealings with your over at Malcolm X. It's tempting to want to use every interesting fact or impressive quotation from a new source, but at the same time an article can be quickly overwhelmed. I've tried to trim it back to the central points. EEng 19:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes you were, but I appreciate you reaching out to me. I mean no malice and I realize as a detail-oriented person that I may have added overwhelming info. I see the edit you did and I agree with a trim, but I think it's important to add Malcolm's Effect on Ali, and that he said he may not have become a Muslim if it wasn't for Malcolm. Also, the Liston fight which Ali invited Malcolm to is a big event and is info most people probably don't know. I've added those 2 points. Please don't remove them, I think that would be a fair compromise. Twixister (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twixister, you have a lot to learn about Wikipedia, and you may be jumping in over your head. Your citations are a mess (I've had to clean massive amounts of trash code from them every time you edit), and beyond that they are in the wrong format, as you can clearly see. When quoting a work that is used more than once in the article, you should be using the format that is common to article -- please look at the References section. Please also learn to indent your talkpage posts with colons (as I have done here) to correctly nest your reply under the post you are replying to. And please always sign your talkpage posts by typing four tildes, and preview your post before saving to make sure that you have done so. If you are indeed a "detail-oriented person", then you need to demonstrate that by learning how to use Wikipedia correctly and by the precision with which you edit Wikipedia. The Wikipedia Adventure (above) will help you, and teach you all the things that we really don't have time to relate. You need to also demonstrate collaborativeness in interacting with others. Please get consensus for your edits on the article's talkpage before continuing to replace them. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Softlavender, My apologies. Thank you, will do! Twixister (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Twixister, and welcome to Wikipedia. (I know you registered a few years ago, but almost all of your edits have been made in the past few weeks.) I appreciate the material you have added to Malcolm X, but please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collaboratory effort. We have very strict rules against edit-warring (repeatedly adding the same material after it's been removed). I understand your enthusiasm, but you need to discuss your proposed changes at Talk:Malcolm X and try to build consensus for them. Also, keep in mind that an encyclopedia article cannot include all verifiable information on a subject, and it is your responsibility to build consensus to include material that has been disputed.

Malcolm X is one of about 5,000 "featured articles" on Wikipedia considered to be among its best, and we expect new content to be consistent with the high quality of existing content. For example, citing web sources may be acceptable on 99% of Wikipedia, but whenever possible, we expect editors to cite published books as sources for featured articles. We expect new footnotes to be consistent with the format already in use for the 300+ footnotes in the article. And we expect editors to discuss their proposed changes when they run into resistance from other editors.

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added my proposed changes on Talk:Malcolm X. Twixister (talk) 04:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello again, Twixister. Please make sure you keep your signature on the same line as your post. If you remember to always preview your posts and your edits before you save them, this is easy to do. I have fixed this for you on this thread and on the thread above. Softlavender (talk) 04:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://articles.latimes.com/1991-10-12/local/me-105_1_redd-foxx/2 and other copyright sources. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sofía Vergara, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mistakenformatt. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Richard Pryor have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 01:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits at Tina Turner. However, this has been discussed previously and the consensus then was that the change should not be made, because you are basing the claim on primary sources and because most reliable published sources give her birth name as Anna Mae. Personally, I suspect you may be correct.... but, it needs to be discussed further on the talk page and I will revert your edit until we have this discussion with other editors. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, I've created a topic on her Talk page to discuss this.Twixister (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but please remember to sign talk page posts using four of these ~ Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to this page was reverted because, Community consensus has deemed this as a BLP vio, see Talk:Jimmy_Page/Archive_2#Editors_please_stop_editing_relationship_with_Lori_Maddox and other archived discussions. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tabloid journals reporting on her claims are far from ideal sources - hence, I've added a ^{[better source needed]} tag. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What's Love Got to Do with It (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalgamation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sam Houston Coliseum, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on I Want to Take You Higher. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bolic Sound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Nahal^(T) 07:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Brought Me Back, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inglewood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I, Tina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raymond Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

I've Been Loving You Too Long (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sonny Boy Williamson

Outta Season (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sonny Boy Williamson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pattie Boyd, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Live! The World of Ike & Tina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kings of Rhythm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RPM Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating His Woman, Her Man: The Ike Turner Diaries.

User:Cwmhiraeth while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

If you want to use the block quote in His Woman, Her Man: The Ike Turner Diaries, you must provide a citation.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me of this mistake.Twixister (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Airwaves (Ike & Tina Turner album).

User:Winged Blades of Godric while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

How does this pass WP:NALBUM?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

∯WBG^converse 13:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: It is the last studio album by Ike & Tina Turner. It features unreleased recordings and the first single credited to Tina Turner.Twixister (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Legends Ike & Tina Turner Live in '71, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweet Inspiration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ike Turner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Music Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ike Turner into Ike Turner discography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Symbol Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbol Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 10:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mickey & Sylvia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yvonne Fair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits and references. However, she was surely known primarily as a songwriter, rather than as a singer - so why change the infobox? And, I question the use of the term "singer-songwriter", which is a term that really didn't exist before the 1960s and usually refers to a particular style of music which is quite different to that in which McCoy worked. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning is that she was a singer and songwriter, hence singer-songwriter by definition. I changed her infobox to solo artist simply because she released more than one single as a solo artist. She continued to record well after her heyday of songwriting, but I understand your point of view. It can sometimes be tricky because not all singer-songwriters have a particular style. Mariah Carey is a well-known singer-songwriter, but she doesn't play an instrument. Now looking at her page I can see the distinction between saying "singer and songwriter" vs. "singer-songwriter" in the infobox and in the lede, even though she fits into the categories that are about singer-songwriters.Twixister (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Ike-Tina-Turner-Live.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic . Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sallie-Blair-Squeeze-Me.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Sallie-Blair-Squeeze-Me.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Backing vocalists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed Pat Powdrill. Thanks very much for creating this. Mccapra (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs written by Tina Turner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs written by Tina Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnny Ace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RPM Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunbeam Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunbeam Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 12:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erskine Oglesby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erskine Oglesby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Friskillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Friskillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Friskillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Friskillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm in direct contact with Suzanne about some inaccuracies in her bio, but you have been reverting those changes. Is she not considered a sufficient source for this info? Ajschorr (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, anyone can say that they know the subject of an article. A sufficient source is need when make changes about someone's biography, even if the subject themselves want to change information. Suzanne Mallouk stated in the book Widow Basquiat that she was dating Michael Stewart at the time of his death. There are multiple cited sources to confirm this. The other change I reverted was that her exhibit was sold out. If you have a source that it was sold out then please it, but I've added more cited information about her art career.--Twixister (talk) 23:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ErnestLane.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ike Turner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 01:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ike Turner you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ike Turner for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ike Turner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ike Turner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 04:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Latin music albums by Israeli artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Académie du Jazz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jessiesmith1965.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think your edit was mistake. What was the copyright violation. I see a link to the Oregon Herald which I never referenced. I provided information from books and website with proper citations. You reverted everything.--Twixister (talk) 22:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean-Michel Basquiat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceradon -- Ceradon (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jean-Michel Basquiat you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jean-Michel Basquiat for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceradon -- Ceradon (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Ciccone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Private Eyes (nightclub) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Firefangledfeathers, I fixed the citation and made some revisions.Twixister (talk) 04:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reviewed your article A Father's Story as part of the New Page Patrolling process. Thanks for creating an article for this notable book. I did notice that quotations make up a significant chunk of the article, including a lengthy quote from a New York Times article. It would be preferable if you could paraphrase these quotes in your own words rather than relying on lengthy direct quotes. Per MOS:QUOTE: brief quotations are fine, but "using too many quotes is incompatible with an encyclopedic writing style and may be a copyright infringement." Bennv123 (talk) 09:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sly-The-Family-Stone-I-Want-To-Take-You-Higher.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Twixister. Thank you for your work on List of Ike & Tina Turner live performances. User:FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please convert external link to refs

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FuzzyMagma: Hello, no problem! I will convert them today.~~~~ Twixister (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Twixister. Thank you for your work on W.C. Handy Theatre. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Twixister. Thank you for your work on Hippodrome (Memphis). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Basquiat-leonardo-da-vincis-greatest-hits-1982.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Self-Portrait as a Heel (Part Two).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Carcrash1980.jpg
• File:Basquiat Action Comics One.jpg
• File:Jean-michel basquiat job analisis.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Basquiat Action Comics One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carcrash1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jean-michel basquiat job analisis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Self-Portrait as a Heel (Part Two).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Twixister, I just retitled a bunch of articles you created, mostly from (YEAR painting) to (Basquiat), to match the typical dab modifier for paintings. Some would be fine at (painting) if you'd prefer to move to that. Didn't realize they were literally all by the same editor, would've been good to consult you beforehand, apologies. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Schiano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick Hughes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The-Ikettes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of directorial debuts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jed Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit to Truman Capote you used {{Sfn|Clarke|2005|p=442}} and {{Sfn|Clarke|2005|p=508}}. Unfortunately there are two works "Clarke 2005" used in the article, namely Clarke, Gerald (2005). Capote: a biography (2nd Carroll & Graf ed.). New York: Carroll & Graf. ISBN 9780786716616. and Clarke, Gerald (2005). Too Brief a Treat: The Letters of Truman Capote. Random House. ISBN 978-0-375-70241-9., so it is impossible for readers to know which you intended. This is a common problem with short citations. If you could fix the references it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem. I'll fix the citations.--Twixister (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

I reverted your edit because if we mention every work Dali did in his career the article would be nothing but a list of works. None of the major scholarly monographs on Dali mention this work and it is not considered one of his major or notable ones. The wikipedia policy on undue weight given to minor aspects of the subject applied here. Wikipedia:UNDUE

As for his election to the Academia Real de Bellas Artes in 1973, do you have a better source for that? As far as I can see, the link you provided doesn't say this.

Happy to discuss on the article talk page. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]