User talk:Trident13/archive2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Leo Gradwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Middlesborough and Trawler

Sports Toto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tender and Gaming

Alex Lowes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shane Byrne

Convoy PQ 17 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Trawler

Tenby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plague

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to December 1981 windstorm may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/gesw1206blpp-e-e.pdf|title=Somerset and the sea|publisher=[[Environment Agency|accessdate=5 December 2014}}</ref><ref name=bos-06-12-13>[http://www.burnham-on-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Re this revert: (i) observe that in my edit, I removed one unsourced sentence, andt since your edit included the addition of two sources, the edit summary was untruthful in its use of the words "Undid revision 588889663 by Redrose64"; (ii) please read WP:NPA before you call somebody an "idiot"; (iii) I did read it, and it appeared to fall within WP:NOR in its use of the phrase "were more likely factors"; (iv) please read WP:VAND before you use words like "vandalising". --Redrose64 (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I feel fully justified in my edit summary comment (1) why do we have general references? They were already in the footer, yet (2) in your usual "I'm right, the rest of you are wrong" attitude, your edit summary was your normal vindictive "speculation" style (have you actually read your edit summaries?) (3) which seems to suggest an attitude at preset beyond encyclodpedic and verging specifically in edit summaries of pedantic. I don't know you except from your edit record, but it seems that much as though you could add much to the project, your edit summaries at present are excluding co-operation and engagement with others editors - specifically, excluding particularly new editors. Perhaps you are holding on too tight, and should review your edit summaries? Accuracy and referencing yes, but does that need to come with a present attitude of non-co-operation on a human scale and vindictive exclusion? I hope that you find a more human and inclusive situation - Good Luck! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 20:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with general refs is that there is no way of knowing which ref(s) support which sentence(s) in the text. There are six books listed under "Further reading" - how am I supposed to know which one to request from my local library?

It is easily demonstrable that Swindon is not the mid-point - the station is at milepost 77+1⁄4, and since Bristol T.M. is close to mp 118+1⁄2, that places Swindon 65% of the way along the line - almost two thirds. The true mid-point is close to mp 59+1⁄4, which is between Steventon and Wantage Road. I have checked through

• MacDermot, E.T. (1927). History of the Great Western Railway, vol. I: 1833-1863. Paddington: Great Western Railway. pp. 120–121.

in which we find a letter from Gooch to Brunel, dated 13 September 1840, containing the reasons for the choice of Swindon: it is too lengthy to reproduce here, since it occupies 1.5 pages of small type - but it does include several relevant points: it is the junction for Cheltenham; it was the point where the gradients change - in particular, it is close to the bottom of Wootton Basset incline; it was close to a canal. There is nothing about it being chosen as the mid-point for the line - indeed, Gooch notes "an apparent inequality of distance or duty for the engines to work", and gives "the actual distances are as 76+1⁄2 to 41". He later observes that since Reading is "36 miles, the next distance, to Swindon, would be 41 miles, and on to Bristol, another 41" - so Swindon is a mid-point, but between Reading and Bristol, and not for the line as a whole, which is what was implied by the text that I removed.

There are a number of people that (for whatever reason) are ignoring WP:NOR and WP:NOT#OR. Offering unsourced opinions on why something was done in one way as opposed to another is original research. What you don't see when I am reviewing my watchlist is the large number of edits made by others which go without comment from myself. These I do look at, but since I see nothing wrong, I pass on to the next. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you can not see the references beyond your opinion, then why edit an encyclopedia that relies on its credibility through stating third party references? You can argue mid-point in your opinion until the cows come home, but at the end of the day that's your opinion not a referencerable fact. As the references and article states, the "mid-point" in not defied by Gooch as the physical distance mid-point, but the engineering journey mid-point between the smooth journey from London to Swindon, and the relatively steep journey to Bristol thereafter. Early locomotives were not reliable, needed changing, and like all steam powered devices needed a supply of water. But that's the whole point you are missing here - you are reading the facts (distance not journey) from your perspective, not from the written references. That's the whole point that you are missing here, and its a difficult one to grasp - and it shows in your far too aggresive edit summaries. Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 14:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

```Buster Seven Talk 13:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shardlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roman, Turnpike, JCB, Lockington and James Paine

Moddershall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mills

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trident13.

It is not my edits that does not look constructive. You've actually edited the article twice. First, you made some sentences/paragraphs look like spam and then second, you deleted them. If you will read my original edits, you'll see that it is relevant, constructive and important information. My edits are also unbiased. What I've added are undeniable, factual information supported by reliable published references.

I am reverting this back to the original version before your 2 edits.

Joseph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephgallos (talk • contribs) 04:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tidying/improving the North Nibley page. Do you have a North Nibley connection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belloway (talk • contribs) 15:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David McMurtry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Austin

Dorothy Lawrence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chatham

Metaverse Mod Squad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Consulting

QVC (UK) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harry Greene

Solair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glider

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your Wikipedia:Vandalism#Blanking.2C_illegitimate. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cad and the Dandy, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephgallos (talk • contribs) 04:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bal Rajagopalan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Johns, The Globe and Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trident13. I gather you might not be aware, so to clarify the current situation, WikiExperts.us has been community banned from Wikipedia. It is an unusual case, as the same model was applied as that given to Wiki-PR, whereby the ban extends to all related organisations, people connected with WikiExperts, and employees. - Bilby (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message - I am not surprised! He approached me re doing some work for him, asked me to sign an NDA, then - nowt! Used some of my day-job skills then to do some background research, and was resultantly happy that the "opportunity" didn't go any further. I didn't see any of the organisations or subjects that he had as clients, but some of the projects that he was offering services to wouldn't have passed WP:NOTAB with a gale force wind behind them. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Terry Ronald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gun Shy and Lorie

Muchelney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to District Council

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Geoffrey R. Pyatt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• EU| author = AFP| date = February 6, 2014| accessdate = February 6, 2014|publisher = news.yahoo.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-06/intercepted-phone-call-shows-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bowater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Scandinavian, Gravesend and Catawba

Mineral wagon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to LMS, Air brake and Pressed Steel

Tudeley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bluebell and Primrose

ECOnetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Overdrive

Eric Vansittart Bowater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gravesend

Kemsley Paper Mill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bow

Ridham Dock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've nominated this for WP:DYK. I hope you don't mind. Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Dawlish Avoiding Line. Simply south...... disorganising disorganisation for just 7 years 22:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Dawlish Avoiding Line at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2 Sisters Food Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sunderland

List of locomotives saved from Woodham Brothers scrapyard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to South Devon Railway

Robert Earl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Caesars Entertainment

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily Swallow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NCIS and High Fidelity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clive Coleman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nyt.co.uk/clive_coleman.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cauley Woodrow is included in the U21s sourced from the official Fulham website, he has not been included in the senior squad yet. JMHamo (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Railway stations in Arnhem, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Clive Coleman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dead Ringers, Heartbeat, Crossroads and ITV

Mark Evans (TV presenter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Surrey Hills and Dog show

Caroline Dinenage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Franchise

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bal Rajagopalan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ken Hames has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable--refs for career are press releases or personal web pages. SAS service aloe is not notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the article should be AFD'd? The Jewish Chronicle looks to be the only good source. The others are primary, about the company not him, or is the BusinessWeek profile from its database, which I think just regurgitates official profiles. BTW - I was interested in seeing why Jimbo disapproves of you as stated on your userpage, but the link did not go to the archives where the discussion is presumably located. CorporateM (Talk) 15:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to ask one question What do you think is the main reason for the lack of confidence in the public toward the police today. I have my own reasons for this question and would like a honest to goodness answer,In return I will give you a honest to goodness reply —richardson733@btinternet.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.155.47 (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am looking into the history of the Nicholson gin brand for a client. I am a trainee solicitor at Stephenson Harwood LLP. We are based in London.

I notice that you added the Nicholson brand to the "Notable brands" section of the "Gin" article, and that you also created the J&W Nicholson article.

We act for the person who has recently acquired the rights to the Nicholson and Nicholson Lamplighter brands and we are looking for people who have knowledge of them.

I wonder if you would be open to me contacting you via email to discuss this further? Please know that this is merely a request to help a famous old gin brand.

Please do not hesitate to contact me directly in relation to this matter (details below).

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

Joshua Cunnington Trainee Solicitor Stephenson Harwood LLP 1 Finsbury Circus London EC2M 7SH Direct Line: +44 (0) 20 7809 2256 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua.cunnington (talk • contribs) 14:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Jean McConville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neither Confirm Nor Deny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chittening may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Chittening, with supplied by the near by [[National Smelting Company]] at [[Avonmouth Docks]].<ref>{[cite book|author=Haber L.F.|date=1986|title=''The Poisonous Cloud|publisher=Oxford University Press|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Avonmouth Docks may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• at [[Chittening]], plus the main plant at [[Banbury]] and a third plant at [[Hereford]],<ref>{{cite book|author=Haber L.F.|date=1986|title=''The Poisonous Cloud|publisher=Oxford University Press|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Avonmouth Docks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lock and Ministry of Defence

Goldney family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Clifton and Freeman

ROF Rotherwas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chittenden and Mary Tudor

National Smelting Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ministry of Defence

Romney hut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ministry of Defense

William Champion (metallurgist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to River Avon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sandstone Estates page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Filling Factory, Banbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chittenden, Home Guard, Canary, Shrapnel and Ministry of Works

James Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gwent and West London

Crowcombe Heathfield railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tramway

New York Model Management (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to East Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bantham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Roman and Smithy

Card Factory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maplin

Goole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Europort

Yu Wenxia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harbin University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC 97.3, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam (talk • contribs)

When did WP:MOS start saying that redirects shouldn't be categorized?

Also, please read WP:BRD. It's not B, R, R-again-because-you-know-you're-really-right. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message - in light of your tone, can you please read WP:AGF. The WP:MOS note re cats on redirect pages came in over 2 years ago. I used to add cats onto such, but someone who was trying to be an editor quickly pointed out the change to me. Secondly, the categories that you are trying to add back are all presently listed in the article to which the redirect points to. Hence, both the redirect and the actual article are listed in all three cats. The WP:MOS directive says that you should only add cats if the redirect name adds to the wider categorisation of the subject. As the three cats are repliacted, what's the point? Hope that you understand hence why I removed them, and see no sence on either a WP:MOS or logical level to add them back. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sir John Pound, 1st Baronet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Omnibus, The Day, Purse and James Ritchie

Ruddington Depot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Home Guard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call me "lazy". There's no need to be rude and unpleasant. Though I appreciate a disambiguation page for Vulcan Hotel has its merits. See you around! Sionk (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on re-opening this and related cans of worms. I applaud your "rewrite the darned thing! We will ALWYS trip over ourselves if we keep up the Yankification of Wikipedia - same words have different terms in different parts of the world". Though startled by the quite remarkable lapse of the succeeding editor. Mind you I'm not sure your re-write was correct but then neither is what you were re-writing. I look forward to a "re-development" of the little article this time using reliable references. Best wishes to you, Eddaido (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message - I hope that I find you well! I think certain cans of worms are worth reopening - have a look at the definition of Biscuit, which had become in the seemingly continual process of Yankification as something which was definitively (and not to be argued with) soft doughy objects in gravy. We now have Biscuits (European) and Biscuit has become a big-link/virtual disambiguation page. If you read the German and French Wiki articles on the same Coupe de Ville subject (translations available via Google), then they follow the same form as I did in the rewrite - hence why I did as I did to improve the article. These accept that the words can have different interpretations in different countries - why should we as an encyclopaedia be afraid of this? As a Brit (much as though I spent 20 years working in North America), I haven't got a clue what a Town Car is above a Lincoln model. If you ask me to define an open front topped/enclosed rear car then I'd call it a Sedanca de Ville, as (a) I own one, and (b) the UK dealer chap who I bought it from described it as such, as that's what the Rolls Royce/HJ Mulliner build sheet described it as such. I also accept that if I went to France and Germany, they would define it as a Coupe de Ville, which would have a very different interpretation in North America (hence why I added a North America section in the rewrite - plus it keeps them happy). I personally don't think that if there are major reference sources that clash we should be worried as an encyclopaedia to provide reader guidance around the wording - the article before I started my rewrite didn't even define the term as French language in origin! I think that there is a lot more to go on the article, but the opportunity here is in (1) the definition of what the word means and then (2) how then each area of the world interprets it. Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 10:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Trident13. As an avid collector of tales of Wales, I dug out the Weiss/Daily Mail thread linked at your user page ("I will be the first to admit I don't always get it right - and the typed internet is not sometimes the best medium through which to have clear communication. But I hope the contribution I make is useful and valued ... even though Jimbo Wales doesn't think so, and made a personal attack on me." — Emphasis added in the link, for clarity.) It's a long and rather chaotic thread, and I didn't find the personal attack; I must have missed it in the to and fro. Doubtless you can go straight to it, so please would you do me a favour and quote it, at least partially, for me (on my talk page if you prefer) so that I can find it when I search again? Then I can add it to my precious (off-wiki) collection of quotes from our revered founding father, who is now also of course a world-renowned champion of free speech. The page is archived, so here is a working link to it for your convenience: [1]. Many thanks. Writegeist (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message - I hope that I find you well! I don't seek a 1on1 confrontation with Jimmy Wales, nor do I wish that to be the outcome of the post on my FP. My great disappointment with Jimmy Wales choice on that occasion - and on numerous occasions since - was that it cut straight across the rules and accept practises of Wikipedia, something which Jimmy claims to live by. The reality is clearly different, in that (1) he thinks he can cut across any Wiki rules, for what ever reasoning, and that (2) a series of underlings hence go forth and do his work, in the vain hope that they may drink from the same table. Jimmy's upset with my edit was further fuelled in that I had chosen to reference the Daily Mail, which as he is someone who is presently married to a Blairite-Labour insider, he considers a sacrosanct sin (if you follow the mentioned above underlings, you will note that they hate the DM even more as part of their commitment/pledge to the JW cause. The DM also on an at least annual basis heavily critic's Wikipedia, most often on accuracy. But the depth of hate between the two organisations goes beyond the public evidence). I fully accept that I made an error in this particular edit, but then so did the newspapers who printed the story (DM, Telegraph, Observer - I have copies of them all), as it was based on a "revenge"-powered false press release pointed towards the victim, who was later compensated by all of the above media outlets. However, does my following of the Wiki rules and quoting references (which I fully accept turned out to be false) justify Jimmy's choice to (1) cut across the rules of Wiki, and (2) send out judgements on others? As personally the rules of Wikipedia are written on a far more collaborative principles - possibly even with socialist aroma's - Jimmy's chosen action illustrated to me the duplicity of the rules here: hence my warning to others, that however you may view the rules here, the "popular/powerful" consider themselves above and beyond them. I have soft and hard copies of all of the above mentioned documents and the exchange on Jimmy's talkpage, but as I said I don't seek a confrontation with Jimmy or anyone here - much as though he broke the rules. So on this occasion I hope that you will understand my choice not to presently provide you with copies of the requested items. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberty Electric Cars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Town car, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Coupe de Ville, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Michael Owen (neurologist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Depression and St Mary’s Hospital

Sam Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wizard of Oz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Soughton Hall, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rhwydwaitharchifaucymru.info/cgi-bin/anw/fulldesc_nofr?inst_id=28&coll_id=1106&expand=.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kingston Lacy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1000718|title=Listing - Kingston Lacy|publisher=[[English Heritage|accessdate=17 June 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kingston Lacy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deer park, Parliamentarian, Charles Blount, Avenue and King Charles I

John Eldon Bankes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Jervis and Vanity Fair

Kamal Bahamdan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to East Coast and Quantitative analysis

Northop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cobblers and MOT

Ann Clwyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Mahon

Terry Richards (actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rambo

Wyre Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pilot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

On this page the link reference to Mark Buckingham near the bottom a triathlete sponsored by the foundation the link does not take you to Mark Buckingham but to Mark Buckingham the comic book artist.

Just thought I would help

Kind regards

--2.103.18.78 (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 09:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roslyn Walker may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• . He married [[Kaleigh Grainger]] in September 2011 and currently resides in the West Midlands).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Soughton Hall has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I was going to add a note here to say that I could hardly believe that an editor of your experience would have made such a foolish mistake, but I find that your talk-page history is already awash with copyvio warnings, and that you seem to have treated them with some considerable disdain. Do you actually want to blocked from editing here? Because if so, I can ask for that to happen, though I can't promise my request will be acted on. If not, may I suggest that you read, learn and inwardly digest our copyright policy, and make very sure that you adhere to it from now on? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:17, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your note. As an article creator I accept that copyvio is a risk - it will always a balance between referencing and original reasearch, and in referencing if you follow the same timeline particalarly for historic articles, then copyvio is a potential outcome. But as for being "awash"? In the early days perhaps, but in recent years? I conclude the tone of your message is purposefully exaggerated - trying to impress someone? I was also dropped a private message by a more experinced Adminstrator who advised me that the settings on the copyvio bot had been tightened, and they noted your awash comment as poorly thought through. I won't multiple-barb my message as per your intent, but would suggest that you go and read WP:AGF. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the risk is sort of increased when you copy-paste content directly from a copyright source into a new article, wouldn't you say? I've read WP:AGF, and your behaviour is definitely beyond its scope. I've so far taken just one small step in that regard (please see below), but obviously there's a great deal more to be looked at. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I note your concerns, but I am fully aware of what copy and paste is versus creation, which can also verge towards original research. If you highly reference something back, then as an article creator you are always playing with CopyVio issues. On this occasion I got it wrong by not following my preferred process (1) my usual form is to create on stubpages or on my own private wiki, and then test - this one I went straight live to (2) you also always play a greater risk with historic articles - time lines are hard to move from, hence that's fixed. I estimate from my own tests by 30% (3) you rely on few sources/singular sources to create a full time line. I'll let the investigation run, but as any contributor must accept, I stand by my contribution record. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trident13. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trident13,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Seb Webber should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seb Webber .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Johny 547 (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paul Davis (Irish author) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Professional speaker

Seb Webber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to M.I.A.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Hogben is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hogben until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 14:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kent and Sussex Crematorium and Cemetery

added a link pointing to Surveyor

Rookley Manor, Hampshire

added a link pointing to Depression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]