User talk:TheNuggeteer

This is TheNuggeteer's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 5 days

Archives

1 (June-August 2023) 2 (September 23-April 2024) 3 (May-June 2024) 4 (June-July 2024 5 (July-August 2024) 6 (August 2024) 7 (August-September 2024 8 (September 2024)

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

email me

Userpage

Talk

Articles

Logs

Directory

Hi there. If you're promoting hooks to the final set, keep in mind that we like to have at least half the set empty, so that problematic hooks from earlier preps can be swapped in if necessary. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the notice! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are willing to further discuss this nomination, as well as nominating more articles for GAN going forward, please do not hesitate to ping me here. I also invite people who have previously said something about it here to participate. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A Boy Is a Gun for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 04:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Well-meaning, but chronically disruptive, editing from TheNuggeteer. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheNuggeteer! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Matticusmadness (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see a welcome on your user page, and, given the current attention you’re getting, thought the links that most welcome templates give out, could serve useful. I’ve asked at the ANI thread what other tasks might fit your skill set. Might be worth chipping in there what you like doing?

Danke. MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 08:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Signing TyphoonAmpil's Guestbook. over 5,000 edits. †TyphoonAmpil† T/C 13:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 23:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there TheNuggeteer, I wondered if you had any interest in helping with some of the older Pacific typhoon seasons. It's clear you have a passion for editing, so I wondered if you had any interest in this task. It's a really important project, but it might take some time. There is a need for most years between 1902 and 1935. You can use IBTRACS, which it seems you're familiar with. You can also use sources like the Monthly Weather Review. For example, September 1935 here.

It's more useful, in my opinion, having more season articles, rather than making new storm articles. Lemme know what you think of the idea. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, looks interesting, I will start the project this afternoon, since I don't have that much time between school. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be right now, it's just a long term project that we're gonna need at some point, and there aren't many people interested in older season articles. I say that because I wrote the 1900 and 1901 PTS articles back in 2016, and in 2017 I worked with a few users to write 1927. I wrote 1931 in 2019, and did 1936/1937 earlier this year. It takes a lot to write these articles, so if you don't feel like it, it's OK, but at some point we're gonna need these articles. I can help you if you'd like. Just lemme know what year you'd wanna start with. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already did the 1902 Pacific typhoon season one, though this one looks particularly unfinished. How about we create a group to work and create these season articles to steadily help the effort? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 11:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who do you have in mind? I'm in the middle of another project (2005 Atlantic hurricane season), so I can help with this project here and there, like provide links and help research certain important storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricanehink Did you ask HurricaneEdgar yet? If not, probably Borgenland. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to try taking the lead? I think you can handle it. Start by reaching out to the others and seeing if they're interested, maybe start with 1935 and work your way backward? Draft:1935 Pacific typhoon season - here is a basic draft you can link. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for being clear and giving guidelines to help fellow editors like me get the Communism in the Philippines article the Good Article rating it deserves. You have done great work for Wikiproject Philippines. TheFloridaMan (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey TheNuggeteer! I read about the ANI situation. Sorry to hear that you went through that. All long-term editors have been in a place once where we ran into some trouble, but I think (from the responses in the thread) you are handling it the correct way. While you are on your topic bans, I will try to help you find smaller projects to do (in between school, of course!).

Here's one: I looked at 19th Congress of the Philippines and there are several members who do not have articles in English Wikipedia. Would you be interested in writing up some of those articles? If they exist in Tagalog Wikipedia, then translate it and either put it in draftspace or mainspace and then I (in AFC) or someone in NPP will look at it. If they don't have an article in the Tagalog wikipedia, then it may need to be written from scratch. Just remember to make sure it's got good sourcing and a NPOV.

If you're not interested in that, let me know if there are other things I can suggest that we need help with.

Best of luck

Bkissin (talk) 21:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you declined my draft for Comedy Central Family (Hungarian TV channel). I just took references from Hungarian Wikipedia'a article and I want to know: which of the sources I took are not reliable?

PS: I already changed some references to that draft. Filippo.g204 (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the Developing Countries WikiContest! You've received 166 points, and here's a special award for your contributions.

... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per consensus at the administrator's noticeboard (link), the following topic ban has been enacted:

"TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) is topic-banned for six months from content assessment processes, broadly construed. This is explicitly noted to include: GA nominations and reviews; FA nominations and reviews; FL nominations and reviews; DYK nominations, reviews, and other participation; Peer review; and AfC/NPP. Where a 'contest of any kind' has any level of overlap (as per 'broadly construed') with any of these explicitly-included processes, this topic-ban extends to that contest."

Please read Wikipedia:Banning policy#Topic ban, Wikipedia:Banning policy#Exceptions to limited bans and Wikipedia:Banning policy#Evasion and enforcement. I encourage you to take the broadest reading of 'broadly construed' possible, to avoid any potential issues.

Details regarding appealing a community-imposed topic ban are contained at Wikipedia:Banning policy#Appeals of bans imposed by the community. This topic ban will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions.

Regards,
Daniel (talk) 01:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]