User talk:Stormshadows00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cherokee freedmen controversy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. This was not copy editing, so "c/e" was not a valid reason for removal. -Uyvsdi (talk) 22:22, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

1. Images removed by ImageRemovalBot. Warranted removal of picture template as there are no pictures there anymore.

2. Lead was getting bloated with size, information that didn't match what was said in cites (January 14, 2011 ruling, not "2007 reinstatement", was the catalyst of August ruling. Stated in article and in cite) and information that has long been updated in main article (it's not "The Cherokee Election Commission is working to provide ways for the Freedmen to vote in the scheduled special election for Principal Chief." when an agreement was already made). Shortened lead. Made sentence encompassing all legal proceedings as listing every detail made lead bigger.

3. "Copy editing" is exactly what I did. Trimming a lead is valid last time I checked. Stormshadows00 (talk) 07:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Cherokee freedmen controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Horseshoe Bend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Quarantine (GRITS album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stormshadows00. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FORCE OF NATURE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stormshadows00. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stormshadows00. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about my edits in the past. I'd like to understand that Rankin/Bass, a defunct New York-based company, allowed the animation of ThunderCats, SilverHawks and The Comic Strip to be done overseas at Pacific Animation Corporation in Tokyo, Japan, not necessarily making them American/Japanese co-productions. They may be American productions that looked anime, but there was one thing that is quite deceiving to us all. It turns out that in addition of traditional animation by the Japanese studios, these four Rankin/Bass TV series even have almost a lot of anime sound effects by either Fizz Sound Creation, Swara Productions, or Anime Sound Production, three companies responsible for their sound works in the Japanese entertainment industry including anime (the country's domestic animation) and tokusatsu (special effects usually focusing on superheroes and monsters). DIC's The Care Bears and Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors have those same sounds as well. So, if all American (North and South), European, Australian and Asian (including China, Korea and the Philippines) production companies outsource their animation works to the Japanese studios, why can't they have recorded anime sound effects? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.57.136 (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ThunderCats (1985–89), SilverHawks and The Comic Strip, three television series from Rankin/Bass Animated Entertainment in New York, New York, may have their respective animation outsourced to Pacific Animation Corporation in Tokyo, Japan, then HOW come they use sound effects from there?! By listening closely with my ears and translating from Japanese to English using Google Translate, I easily recognize those recorded sounds, for they were already provided by Fizz Sound Creation (best known for the sound effects in Toei Animation's Dragon Ball anime series), the E&M Planning Center, Swara Productions, or Anime Sound Production. Other examples shows that I can hear Fizz Sound's effects on the Festival of Family Classics episode Robin Hood (1973), E&M sound engineer Kiyoshi Ohira's effects on The Last Unicorn (1982) where the Toho Company's effects of monster roars - including Godzilla's - can be heard, just like in The Return of the King (1979/80), and even Shizuo Kurahashi, Akiko Muto and Katsuhiro Nakano's effects from Sound Box on Santa, Baby (2001), with the Aoi Studio as one of its recording studio facilities.

If Rankin/Bass can do it, then why CAN'T all of America's other studios duplicate the recorded sound effects from Japan, just in case their film and TV projects were animated in the same Asian country?! This is our anime-like frustration with our blood veins forming the letter X! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.46.130 (talk) 03:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yasuke (anime), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually something of a controversial issue, but most Japanese historians and encyclopedia articles seem to say the "Sengoku" period lasted around a century from Onin War to the downfall of Ashikaga shogunate (or some such event instigated by Nobunaga around 1570). A minority view extends it to the Battle of Sekigahara or even the siege of Osaka Castle. English Wikipedia is currently in line with this minority view because our article on the topic was written back in the bad old days based on dubious pop culture sources that were not cited in the actual article. I intend to fix that in the near future, but it should be a priority to not needlessly cite the minority view in articles on American web series produced in the 2020s. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I should probably apologize. My edit to the article yesterday was not meant as a personal attack on you (I didn't go into the page history to see who added what, when), but since it seems my actions caused some offense, I am sorry. Can we move past this and discuss improvements to the article? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 08:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yasuke (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]