User talk:Snowflake91

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Good evening! I tried editing his wikipedia page and am interested why you reverted the changes?

Greetings! Were your reverts of the cap count for Žan Karničnik based on a technical reason (formatting, infobox syntax, etc.), or were they because of a content error (not actually four, not in league play, etc.)? It may be helpful to open talk page discussion if it's a content issue. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IP did not update the "pcupdate" parameter, he didnt have 4 caps "as of 27 February", it should be changed to the date of the last cap. Snowflake91 (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it is right now. 46.233.91.145 (talk) 21:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's a pain to clean up after IPs sometimes, but some of them may also pick up on it if we model the correct change for them. Also, if the count is right, the better solution for the article is to update the date, not revert the cap count. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Živjo. Hvala. Pa si prepričan, da se je v rodil v Ljubljani? Iz tistega članka namreč to ne izhaja. V prvem viru spodaj na strani recimo tudi piše Jesenice. 212.85.174.201 (talk) 13:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Očitno so mešani viri, nekateri pravijo Jesenice, nekateri pa Ljubljana. Na STA članku iz maja 2002 piše Jesenice, tako da recimo da je potem to kredibilno. Snowflake91 (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ravno gledam

• Senad Tiganj (16):

rojen: 28. 12. 1975 kraj rojstva: Jesenice višina: 185 cm teža: 80 kg klub: Olimpija dosedanji klubi: Jesenice, Slovan, Triglav, SAK, Korotan, Lommel, Hapoel Kefe, Mura nastopi za reprezentanco: 3 goli za reprezentanco: 1 položaj v reprezentanci: napadalec številka dresa na SP: 16 212.85.174.201 (talk) 13:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Da li ti imaš neke izvore za sezone Druge i Treće slovenačke lige i kupa (tabele i rezultati), kojih nema na rsssf.com? Na zvaničnom sajtu NZS i na drugim sajtovima kojima sam tražio. Ti i Linhart ste napravili članke o sezonama tih liga i kupa, ali niste postavili izvore za sezone od 1991 do 1997 godine.

@Jolicnikola: Nema izvora na netu, zvanični sajt NZS nema ništa pre 2000/01, samo 1. SNL. Ovo je Linhart stavio na forum SNPortal.si, izvori su iz starih novina i dnevnika. Pitaj User talk:212.85.174.201 ili User talk:Ludost Mlačani, ovo je obojica Linhart, možda ima nešto na netu. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91: A gde mogu da nađem na tom forumu? Jolicnikola (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://snportal.si/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=615 , ali forum post se ne može da se stavi kao kredibilan vir na Wikipediju. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://snportal.si/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=952, gle ima tu i strelaca svih golova, ne piše u kojem su minutu, ali bitno da ima. Nego imaš li neki izvještaj sa neke utakmice sa minutima golova, brojem gledalaca i sudijom, a da nije finale? Jolicnikola (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nemam, imam samo broj gledalca za utakmice NK Maribora za vse mečeve u kupu 1991-2021 i sve strelce, a nema sudija ili minuta. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A imaš li možda strelce u baraž mečevima za ostanak/plasman u 1. SNL do 2008 godine? Jolicnikola (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ja nemam ništa jer ništa nije na netu, sve ovo treba je tražit u arhivima (novine, knjiga, ...), 90% sam da ima Linhart sve ovo, pitaj ga ovde User talk:212.85.174.201 ili na SNPortal forumu (korisnik Viator & Vektor) Snowflake91 (talk) 21:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Purple Barnstar
		Snowflake91, I just read about the resent unpleasantness and wanted to offer my support for you as a fellow editor here. There is no excuse for anyone to target another human being with vitriolic and hateful words and it's unfortunate that anyone gets to the point in their life where they lose sight of their own humanity and our connection with each other. Just know that you are loved, supported and appreciated, not just for your contributions though they are amazing, but for being the beautiful human being that you are. ARoseWolf 12:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From different users, differnet hours, different days. All of them reveted eventually, all your time will go to waste and to watch over each and every edit. Kill yourself now, Snowflake91. Everybody hates you and you know it. You've already thought about it. Just commit a suicide and do us all a favor. 2A0D:6FC0:195F:D200:74A4:160C:76C1:A10B (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted your IPS, Partner Communications Company, and you will be assigned with a static IP now, and the investigation for threats will be filled. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're the greatest! Thanks for managing the fort!

Adakiko (talk) 10:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ljudski vrt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you reverse my edit? I updated his games and goals and changed the date Noogometni urejevalec (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Noogometni urejevalec: Because you inserted wrong numbers maybe? You included his Maribor caps from the first part of the season as Olimpija caps, and you did this to a few other articles as well, he has 12 caps for Olimpija and 2 for Maribor in 2021-22, but you included all his 2021-22 appearances under Olimpija. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tu se ti opravičujem in bom bolj previden pri spremembah Noogometni urejevalec (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo. Mislim, da tvoj argument za brisanje nagrad(e) ni na mestu. Ne obstajajo večje in/ali manjše nagrade so samo nagrade. Pogled v umetnost npr. film in literaturo, za La la land obstaja celo posebna stran z vsemi nagradami, tudi iz najmanjšega, najobskurnejšega festivala. Če sledimo enciklopedičnem pisanju, ki je nevtralno pisanje, bi morale biti navedene vse nagrade, priznanja, naslovi, ne pa jih tehtati. Ker nagrade imajo neki smisel, verjetno dobitnikom nekaj pomenijo, kaj misliŠ? lp User:Zgnjecko

Hi, Someone want to delete Ricardo (footballer, born June 1976). Can you participatie in discussion Footwiks (talk) 10:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ljudski vrt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ljudski vrt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ljudski vrt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ljudski vrt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://kuenselonline.com/bpl-clubs-initiate-d-league/ (According to Kinley Dorji, BPL qualifier clubs were given preferences this season.) qualifier = super league? onda bi te molio vrati verziju stranice/klubova Sportski recenzist (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ništa nije super league, super league ne postoji više i prestani da intepretuješ stvari po svoje ako nema toga u linkovima, super league se ne omenja več od 2020, ovi regionalni qualifierji nemajo ništa sa super ligo in nečejo imati svoj članak, super liga ima članak jer je bila top division liga mnogo godina pre premier league. Snowflake91 (talk) 21:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kako klubovi igraju bpl ako ne uđu u nju, kvalifikacije su liga po svemu

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_in_Bhutan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportski recenzist (talk • contribs) 12:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1090246259

pokušaj objasniti ovome Sportski recenzist (talk) 11:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1090254374

ako je u pravu, mora se staviti coronation cup za butan - isti model. (klubovi sa afc licencom minimum utakmica) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportski recenzist (talk • contribs) 12:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Coronation Cup" ne postoji, postoji samo "Coronation Championship" (http://www.bbs.bt/news/?p=169427), i ovo nije nacionalni kup butana ali je neki random tournament kao svake godine Snowflake91 (talk) 12:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ne može mi indijac istu stvar različito objasnit molim te da se jednako tretira. bar jigme kup svake godine službeno. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportski recenzist (talk • contribs) 16:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://m.timesofindia.com/city/goa/nine-month-calendar-for-indian-football-from-next-season/articleshow/91774042.cms

koliko ih ostaje pogledaj? da prijavim ko vrati durand cup? super je svi isl i nekoliko i league, post sezonski. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportski recenzist (talk • contribs) 09:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Wanted to clarify something regarding the order of national teams in infoboxes, after your recent edit on Luka Zahović. I was led to believe they should be listed not in chronological order, but rather the 'seniority' level. That's the cases on pages such as Lionel Messi, Neymar or André-Pierre Gignac. Is there a specific rule listed somewhere that specifies that the chronological order should be used? Cheers and take care! KibolLP (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Youth national teams are obviously listed by "seniority" (i.e. you will not list U18 before U17, even if he is capped before), but "B" teams are reserve teams and should be excluded from that I guess, they can be capped many years after making their senior debut. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you change page when Lucas Bergstrom has joined Peterborough on loan until the end of the season. Look online 2A00:23C8:608B:ED01:6C7D:B1FF:FE74:E3A4 (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because we dont include loaned out players at academy pages, just remove him from "current squad" if he is loaned out. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created Balša Sekulić. Please polish article. Thanks.Footwiks (talk) 11:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ALL Slovenian media uses "ć"? Please, send me the list, I am happy to read! CTTFP (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See talk page on the article. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91: my edits are alwayas rollbacked, could you please discuss on the italian page? Thank you!!! --CTTFP (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up. Don't write me again or I report you. DeinNickname (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DeinNickname: Then stop messing around and making useless edits, you have been told THREE times that worldfootball.net profile doesnt have full statistics, and yet you again changed from "84/7" to "69/5" which is a WRONG information. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah.Yeah.Yeah. I get it. fangirl. Now troll somewhere else and leave me alone. DeinNickname (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 93.138.65.235 (talk) 09:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Cheil Worldwide.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Cheil Worldwide logo.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello. Long time no see. Not much different, but I have a question. In some cases, the time of being selected for the national team and the time of debuting for the national team are different. For example, in the case of Jo Hyeon-woo, he was selected first in 2015, but made his debut in a match A in 2017. According to Jo Hyeon-woo's document, the national team period is from 2015, and in this case, Gu Sung-yun also debuted in 2019, but was selected in 2015. However, in some cases, it is being corrected, causing confusion. Which is right? Do you know of any wiki articles that could provide a rationale? If you know anything about this, please let me know. thank you. Issue0501 (talk) 18:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Issue0501: If you mean national years in infobox – we use the year of first appearance and the year of last appearance (when retired), if he was called to the team and never played, then those years should not be listed. For Jo Hyeonwoo, it should be "2017–", while Sung should have "2019–". Snowflake91 (talk) 09:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. If so, do you know of a wiki page where you can see the rules? I'm neutral, but the data of many players is based on the year they were first selected, so if it's an official rule, I think a lot of data should be revised. I don't know where it came from, but it's recorded from when Korean players were first selected, not when they first played. Issue0501 (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Consensus#International career timeframe and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 112#question about national years in the infobox Snowflake91 (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind reply. I have one more question. In this EAFF E-1 Championship, Hwang In-beom played his first game against China and dropped out of the national team list due to transfer problems. In this case, there is a dispute in the Korean version over whether to mark the last call-up as vs. China or the EAFF E-1 Championship itself. I wonder if there is a regulation on which one is correct. Issue0501 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would use China, but both should be fine and correct Snowflake91 (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind reply. Issue0501 (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to my edit on the Women's Super League, I'll try and respond to your edit description here. The Broadcasting section uses numbers in sentences, to quote:

"In March 2021 the FA WSL announced a new record-breaking three-year domestic television rights deal with Sky Sports and BBC beginning 2021–22. Sky will broadcast 44 matches per season with a further 22 matches shown on BBC platforms including a minimum of 18 on BBC One or Two. All other fixtures will remain available to stream for free on the FA Player, the governing body's own over OTT service. Believed to be worth around £8m a season, it is the biggest broadcast deal of any professional women's football league in the world and marked the first time that the WSL's rights had been sold separately from the men's game."

To be honest I don't really have a big issue with this, I just think its consistent to use numbers and/or words since the page uses both. In regards to sponsorship I see no evidence it belongs there as I see nothing to say its sponsorship. I'd argue such a development is not trivial for the league given the sales figures the game regularly receives, plus the fact it’s the first time a women's football league is going to represented in it or any major video game. I think the best place for it is thus in the history section. It’s not a perfect place for it but it seems most fitting of all unless maybe a new section is related, although I don't think there's enough content to fill such a thing. Helper201 (talk) 17:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with compromising to what you have currently changed it to. Helper201 (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers above 12 are not spelled, so it wont be "forty-four matches", but "44 matches" in that case, while twelve should be spelled, see MOS:NUMERAL ("Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words"). Snowflake91 (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do see a big interest towards the article. I'd wish at least to try to make it a FL, would you help me to get it? Dr Salvus 18:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I dont know what should be fixed as this was already reviewed several times. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit the article. I'm arleady editing it and your edits do get me confused. Dr Salvus 20:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didnt actually fix the stuff that was suggested by ChrisTheDude so I fixed it after you, plural/singular stuff was not fixed (are-->is, have-->has), you even changed the sentence to "Juventus holdhare the record" (wtf?), and also what Chris meant is that you need to add "Team from outside the top level of the...", and not to de-link "Italian football system". Snowflake91 (talk) 20:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah right. Silly me... Dr Salvus 20:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to have info on attendance, you should search for the word "spettatori". I'm trying to find info at La Stampa newspaper but let's see whether we can find the missing info somewhere else. Dr Salvus 23:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes the information is inside the text and you have to read it. You don't speak Italian, don't say it doesn't have it. Dr Salvus 11:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, I have a question that I'd like to ask that's related to the discussion that we had over at the AfD for Svit Sešlar. I didn't want to clutter the deletion discussion with any further comments unrelated to the article's merit. I was wondering if there's any sort of community consensus as to what might be attached to a routine source (like a transfer or contract announcement) that could elevate it to significant coverage. Or is the prevailing opinion that routine announcements will be routine regardless? I've been trying to read through some recently closed deletion discussions to perhaps figure out what's what, but with the differing interpretations of GNG and SIGCOV and all that this proves a confusing and subjective guideline to me. Thanks! SmackJam (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, routine reports are exactly like this - a short reports about player signing a contract, going out on loan, scoring a goal etc., while significant coverage needs to be significant and in-depth – for example, articles like this, if you take his father Simon Sešlar for example. Snowflake91 (talk) 21:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I rasied the issue. So I created the discussion] Please participate in.Footwiks (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

which way instead of copying official media should be to provide, and how is third colour used called if not third jersey? i notified malay editors and manufacturing company, you are hiding their blue variant and has to be found why; which sources/laws you accept i will look

There is nothing to provide in terms of sources because the third kit doesnt exist, the only official home kit which was presented is this one. And no, if they changed shorts colours in just one game due to conflicting colours of the opponents, that doesn't make this a third kit, that's just your opinion, there are actually a lot of teams that sometimes switch socks/shorts colours on their home kits for specific matches because of the reasons above, if anything this is just a variation of the home kit, and NOT third kit. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not quite sure which of your fallacies I should address first, so let’s do it chronologically: please provide any evidence that my comparison with the articles for the French, German and Spanish leagues is »literally laughable«, otherwise it’s a non-argument that you use, and figuratively laughable. The well-established INTERNATIONAL names would be »The League«, »Federal League« and »League 1«. What you mentioned are the proper NATIVE names of said leagues. You use a lot of buzz-words without any factual backup - what is »world-class« supposed to mean in this context which is the usage of the native name proper? Irrelevant and unfounded. In addition to that, you contradict yourself: »Austrian Football Bundesliga« uses the German name (Bundesliga) (English »Federal League«); »Serbian SuperLiga« uses the Serbian name (SuperLiga) (English »SuperLeague«), »Slovenian PrvaLiga« uses the Slovenian name (PrvaLiga) (English »FirstLeague«). The Swiss and Maltese Leagues use English naming by default, why you mention them here is beyond me. Clearly, you perform significant POV-pushing here, at best your criteria are arbitrary and inconsistent as is the entire messy naming process - unless you proceed and change these names to English names, your stance has no credibility. Lastly, you mention the english edition of the Croatian Football Federation - they call it the »First Croatian League« on the respective page, which is incorrect. You conveniently ignored the official league website, hnl.hr and the name is »Hrvatska Nogometna Liga«, period. I will not engage and waste my time in correcting POV-pushing, however. Good luck. --esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 14:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We dont use official native names, but English adaptions, period - and who are you to decide that HNL official website is "incorrect" by calling their own competition "First Croatian League" ? Thats your opinion and nothing else. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the revertion on Andres Vombergar he has been called up to Slovenia and he is playing for Slovenia it doesn't matter if he had been capped. Noogometni urejevalec (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does, he needs to be capped to have national teams listed in infobox, it has always been like that Snowflake91 (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

the parameters 'most apperances' and 'top goalscorer' appeared, but the function was deleted by another user on the template ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_football_tournament ) itself.

The parameters are also mentioned on the page in the article there and would only have to be integrated as a function.

Is there a specific reason these two parameters should not appear? Miria~01 (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about that, there were probably some kind of consensus to remove those parameters for every competition that isn't a domestic league. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, have started a discussion in WT:FOOTY to ask if there is a consensus that these parameters should only appear in domestic leagues.

I think it would be a pitty, if it should really be the case, but I would of course accept it. Miria~01 (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Johor Darul Ta'zim F.C., I see your point. If the changes are against established consensus yet multiple individuals are changing the flag anyway, I suggest:

1. Create a section on the talk page explaining the established consensus.
2. Add a short wikitext comment next to to the flag explaining that it is not to be changed without discussion
3. When reverting edits, reference the section on the talk page

I understand the need to revert incorrect edits. I think it will be much easier if you take the high road and follow the dispute guidelines instead of only reverting.

--Frogging101 (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of those Malaysian / Indonesian IP editors read or care about edit summaries, notes and talk pages, not to mention the language issues - explaining policies to them would be like trying to talk to a wall. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I requested semi-protection: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase#Johor Darul Ta'zim F.C. Frogging101 (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Snowflake91! The list you nominated, List of Coppa Italia finals, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you edited the background on the South Korea men's soccer team page to white. Why is this?, what consensus?. Most other national football team articles use a blue background for fourth place finishes. Xc4TNS (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because no one has deleted it from the other pages yet, see WP:FOOTYCOLOURS and this discussion Snowflake91 (talk) 14:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case then why isn't it being done?, if people come to a consensus they should edit it themselves. This is the only football team article I've seen that doesn't use a blue background for fourth place teams. Xc4TNS (talk) 23:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please check out Category:Lists of national association football team managers

There is a list category about national football team manager All articles are not like England national football team manager. Most articles are about just manager list.

Besides, List of South Korea national football team managers are not about just list. This article have manager records.

Let's keep seperate and enrich article like England national football team manager together. Footwiks (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why did you just revert while giving absolutely no reason or making your point. 'how about no' ? that's not exactly a good reason for reverting a constructive edit. hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 12:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because thats an overkill and obsolutely zero reasons to add gold coloured backgrounds, its a standrad layout for such lists, maybe get consensus on talk page first before you do major visual changes to articles that are marked as "featured lists". Snowflake91 (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Except that’s not standard layout? Have you seen any sports titles list at all? Check the f1 list or the nfl list or literally most such list, and you’ll see it’s color coded hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 14:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take stuff out of context, the colours at List of Super Bowl champions are to determine division titles and are perfectly fine, while having useless gold background for WC winners is not fine, it adds absolutely nothing to the article since the champions are already listed in left column and the runners-up in right column. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You realize having everything in black and white on Wikipedia is not good presentation right?😂 it's not out of context, it shows that when required, we regularly highlight cells to show the winner. There was no need for any shading in 2022 Formula One World Championship#World Drivers' Championship standings. It absolutely does add something, the fact that it helps clearly dilineate the winners and losers and adds a degree of presentability. There's no harm done by having colored cells. hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 15:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, we don't use colours simply for decorative purposes to "not have everything in black or white", and yeah you are right, it shows that when required - but in that case it is NOT required because it is freaking clear that the left-sided teams are the winners and the right-ones are the runners-up, so you don't need to put winners in gold just for the sake of using colours. We also don't have colours for winners in any of the similar football articles, check List of UEFA European Championship finals, List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League finals, List of Copa América finals, List of FA Cup winners etc. etc., and there is a good reason for that. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please don't arrange new players in position order and stay new players in date order. This arrangement is waste of time. In the near future, I'll arrange players in official player number. Footwiks (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Snowflake91,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snowflake91, how are you? I want you to help improve player career statistics in the Japanese league because I have typed them one by one first. That is all and thank you. Ydlp19 (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why are you undoing edits for no reason whatsoever? 2001:8F8:173D:AEA6:8C60:CBBE:1E01:BDA3 (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was clearly explained to you a few sections above, all socks of User:HyperionLEO will be blocked if you will keep adding gold background colours without any consensus on the talk page. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Snowflake91,

you added the Logo 2023 Men's Junior World Handball Championship.png to the article 2023 Men's Junior World Handball Championship.

I'm working on the refernding german article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-21-Handball-Weltmeisterschaft_2023 and would like to add this logo there, too. But I couldn't find your file on Wikipedia Commens German or English.

Could you please send me a link to the source file on your Wikipedia commens?

Or could you add the file directly to the German Wikipedia article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-21-Handball-Weltmeisterschaft_2023?

That would be great. Thank you in advance, Balou20 (talk) 09:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logos are licensed as non-free files and cannot be uploaded to Wiki Commons, they need to be uploaded separetely at each Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the United States the WK league would be considered professional due to professional ranking status. Agents consider the league professional. Do to language barrier only Korean websites say semi-professional which is the incorrect term if players are being paid, have national team experience and transfer from Chelsea and transfer to clubs like Manchester City. I did my research and I spoke to Agents and this is first division soccer in Korea and considered pro by agents. Please stop changing it back. I put sources to prove this with an international ranking of women’s professional soccer teams. Thank you! Rachelsmith444 (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thats your opinion and not what the Korean sources are saying, the league is a semi-professional as only foreign players are getting paid + a couple of best Korean players, no one cares what the agents are saying to you, you need to provide a WP:RELIABLE source which clearly says "WK League is a fully professional league", otherwise it will stay like that. And by the way, your "source" is just a "team ranking based on the performance of clubs in international and national tournaments over the last 12 months" according to the website itself, where on this site does it say that WK League is a professional league? Nowhere, and even if Hyundai Angels is a fully-pro club, that DOESN'T mean that entire league is fully-pro. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And no, just because Ji So-yun joined the WK League from Super League, that doens't suddenly makes this league "fully professional", if only a few players have pro contracts, that makes the league semi-professional. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rachelsmith444, I'm South Korean, WK League is definitely Semi-professional League. As you say, WK League players are being paid. That's right. But Players in Boeun Sangmu WFC. They are also professional soldiers. There is a some lack in Professional League. And, in the South Korea. Anyone including press don't think that WK League is Professional League. South Korean Women Football's long period objective is launch a fully professional League.Footwiks (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Includes all team from NWSL and La Liga and WK League as world wide professional team ranking so this is a source. Please look. Rachelsmith444 (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See above, this is just a team ranking based on domestic performances and nothing more, it is nowehre said that all teams from this country are fully professional. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I opened a discussion about club years in player infobox.

As you know, K League, J League, Major League Soccer and so on, season is one year (2022 season, 2023 season) But European Football League and so on, seasonsi conseccutive year (2021-2022 season, 2022-2023 season)

This difference cause confusion about club years in infobox and I think that this is very important issue about club years of K League players.

If you have spare time, please participate in discussion. Footwiks (talk) 11:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Snowflake91, There's a lot of sodium chloride* in the edit summaries of 1/2/3/4. *Salty: "Internet slang for the feeling of resentment" Why though. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because this isn't a newbie, but someone who is disrupting and edit warring on purpose since at least 2019, and have had like 50+ bans since then, including at least 15 accounts, and is always using insults. It's actually shocking that he isn't range blocked yet. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand: NZS says DNŠ aren't the successor of Korotan, but in their national cup they play as Korotan? Ame71 (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And who can prevent them to use the name "Korotan"? They can use whatever they want for the name, even though NK Korotan Prevalje and DNŠ Prevalje are legally two different entities, but they cannot prevent them to use the name and compete as "Korotan Prevalje", same as NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005) case. See their Facebook, of course they won't call themselves "DNŠ Prevalje", thats just how they are legally registered in the company register when the old club was liquidated for high debts. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I will use [[DNŠ Prevalje|Korotan Prevalje]] also in the Italian wikipedia. Ame71 (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you about the "Bloudkova velikanka" longest ever jump to be deleted, as it turned out that Lanišek never actually jumped 149 meters in Planica 2014, as it was published. But it was only 133 meters. As Cene Prevc explained in Planica 2023 (RTV Studio) he and Lanišek back then (in 2014) both jumped circa 133 meters, but from much lower gate than nordic combined skiers. Jury simply compensated lower gate with distance, adding them more meters instead of points/time, as there was no gate/wind compensation back then in Nordic combined. Cene Prevc's explanation on 24.2.2023 (see at 5:05). Sportomanokin (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SnowFlake91, hope you doing well. I'm currently in a confusion: will FMInside (football manager) be used as a citation/reference in articles on Wiki or not! I've never used it, if you guide me about it's usage here, that will be truly helpful. Regards 🙏🏻 Billjones94. Billjones94 (talk) 15:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, this looks like user-generated content just like transfermarkt. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Billjones94 (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my edit reverted ,it is correct

ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not list group lineup changes at this page, its completely irrelevant, she is not solo artist Snowflake91 (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt mention her as solo, i mentioned it like the group name and her name ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, she is not a solo artist so its irrelevant, do not list group lineup changes to Source Music page under former artists Snowflake91 (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But in other entertainment , it has been mentioned ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SnowFlake91, I would like to point out that an edit you deleted of mine, you wrote in the comments "do not include "other" in the table if he has 0 "other" appearances per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players". I would like to inform you that I am fully aware of this article and nowhere does it state what you have written.

Please do not feel as I though am trying to criticise you, as if you see all my edits I follow the same template taken from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players.

Regards Kai Lau (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does, it clearly says "inappropriate columns can be omitted, e.g. if the player has never played in a country with a League Cup competition, or in a Continental competition", which is obviously valid for "other" competitions as well since Guangzhou / Henan never played in any other competition beside CSL / FA Cup / AFC CL when Kyum was part of the team, not to mention that you reverted all other edits including fixing weird sentence when word "as" was used in a completely wrong way. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your edits and I'd like to think you are active with the footballers article. The article Samir Handanović has been edited by both of us for a long so i wrote you to ask your opinion about something "cosmetic" i wanted to do to the article. I was wondering if we can devide the club career section, more specifically his inter milan section in "minisections" (hopefully I'm making sense). To give you an idea of what I'm thinking about I'm going to demonstrate it below.

• 2012–2015: Debut and first years
• 2015–2017: Champions League pursuit
• 2017–2020: Captain armband and return to Champions League
• 2020–: First trophies and decline

It would like to do this instead of the boring "2012–13 season" and so on. I think the content i wrote on top would look better cosmetically. Let me know what you think. Best regards. ––––Sadsadas (talk) 23 April 2023, 19:28 Sadsadas (talk) 23:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadsadas: Yes, this is how the career section should be like according to other articles of top tier footballers, if someone was at the club for 11+ years it makes no sense for having a sub-section for every single season, you can change it if you want. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Snoeflake91: Hey whats up. I did finish the career section. Let me know how it looks, and feel free to make a change if needed. Thank you.

Hello, why do you delete where the leaving players will play? Pressburg10 (talk) 06:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this even important? This belongs to the player's article, not the club's article, leaving/joining section should just list all the players that left/joined, and not the clubs where they will play in the next season. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is everywhere there, at every clubs without problem. Why do you want to decide it alone, that its unneccesary?! This is not your page, not your property. Its very unfair you want do decide it alone what can be on this site. Pressburg10 (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its not your page either, can you link where is the consensus reached for this at WP:HANDBALL or anywhere else? WP:OTHERSTUFF applies, it doesn't really matter if every other article has this. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, its not mine, and not yours. I only use the same rules, as at every clubs. This is the only page where it can't be on the page, and its your own decission. Is it fair?

I don't like your style, sorry. You are not able to work with others. Pressburg10 (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again - who decided that this is the official style for handball clubs? No one as the WP:HANDBALL project is more or less dead and inactive anyway, it was probably decided by one person (you?), and then it was just copy/pasted to other articles, so the argument "this is used at every other articles" is not really valid, per WP:OTHERSTUFF. The sources are saying that the players have left the club after their contracts expired so they left the club as free agents, this is not football as there are no direct transfers between clubs for money in handball, so the information for which club has one player signed while being contractless is irrelevant to RK Krim. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was not me. Do what you want. Pressburg10 (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have spare time, Can you participate in below discussion?
Spartan_3000 Discussion

Some user don't believe South Korean reliable sources and it has raised a dispute.

Anyway, Thanks Footwiks (talk) 06:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted some of the recent edits made, including to 2023 AFC Asian Cup once again, and I note there are other dubious or misinformed edits occurring at other articles for future Asian sporting events (e.g. 2027 AFC Asian Cup). Does this person need a short-term block, and if so, can you organise ? Matilda Maniac (talk) 23:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Are you busy?

I received the official answer from Republic of Korea Marine Corps and uploaded the screenshot. But some guy think that this screenshot have possibility of fake by photoshop.

I really need your help. Please participate in discussionFootwiks (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your clarification about the player's status! I forgot that contracts have slightly earlier expiring dates in several European countries...

Is it because of a different league schedule? Oltrepier (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Snowflake91. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Coppa Italia finals – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 17. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

Please have a look at these two PORTUGUESE match reports (https://www.record.pt/futebol/futebol-nacional/2--liga/detalhe/sporting-b-u-madeira-0-1-golo-de-soares-da-vitoria-918180?ref=Pesquisa_Destaques and https://www.ojogo.pt/futebol/1a-liga/sporting/noticias/equipa-b-perde-no-sexto-jogo-sem-marcar-4275835.html), Mica Pinto is the missing player and not Mr. Silva. I believe Portuguese newspapers should be correct about a Portuguese player; plus, if you leave that version of the box, the Sporting storyline will be incorrect.

Attentively, sorry for any incovenience 193.137.135.5 (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I browsed the web a little more, could not find any Sporting CP official lineup/news report. But, for common sense, i can tell you that the ones i sent you are very likely correct, since they present Ricardo Esgaio as RB, Tobias Figueiredo and Nuno Reis as CB and M. Pinto as LB. Not saying it could never happen, but it seems unlikely that they played with two right-backs.

Regards from Portugal --193.137.135.5 (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! Wanted to clear up why and how I made the edit regarding Dino's honours - it seems unlikely that he would be credited for winning the 2012-13 Slovenian Cup, as he was not part of matchday squad once during that campaign - he did however make an appearance during the 2015-16 edition. Soccerway seems to more and more unreliable every day. If the preferred way is to credit him for the 2012-13 win however, I won't argue with that and will be happy with the call you make. Cheers! KibolLP (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Endri Çekiçi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some user reported me to Administrator Notice Board. Administrator Notice Board

If administrators block me, Let's meet up someday in Wikipedia.

It was a pleasure working with you on articles about FC Seoul.

I look forward to your good contributions on articles about FC Seoul constantly.

Thank you for everything you have done for me and articles about FC Seoul.

Best regards, Take care! Footwiks (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Footwiks (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, some user want to delete Commemoration Section. in the Association football culture

If you have spare time, Please participate in the discussion at the WikiProject Football Footwiks (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think Mountain biking at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival should be merged into Cycling at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival? So currently move and expand. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pelmeen10: Yeah, thats why I unlinked Cycling at the template because there should not be 3 different articles (Cycling at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival, Mountain biking at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival and Road cycling at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival), it should be all under Cycling like at the Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simple calculation are not original research, see WP:CALC. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pelmeen10: those numbers at 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival#Participating nations are not even correct in the first place, for example Bosnia has 15 athletes listed on the website, Austria 56 etc., even thought apparently the official website has wrong numbers as well. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Snowflake91, it looks like you're engaged in an edit war at this article. You're experienced enough to know to engage rather than revert which it looks like you've done. Also I'd caution you about edit summaries such as this where you ask if another editor is illiterate. That's a clear personal attack and isn't conducive to productive editing particularly with a newish editor who may not know that what they're doing is disruptive. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:2023 IIHF World Championship Division I A.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ester Sokler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ester Sokler has claimed that he has often been mistaken for a woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ester Sokler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ester Sokler), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2022 FIBA U20 European Championship.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Instead of returning, you can add a column (row) and add the names of the winning clubs. It may not take more than ten minutes. While I spent an hour on that table. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MHcc20 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MHcc20: Then spend another 10 minutes and fix it, where is the problem? Why should other people fix the wrong edits after you? Your edits are de facto wrong, "Japan" is not the winner of the 2022 AFC Champions League, "Saudi Arabia" is not the winner of the 2021 AFC Champions League etc. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because

One - I am completing another one.

Two - I believe my edit is completely correct. I even changed the title. I wrote the winning country. The country of the winning club. The national team of Japan and Saudi Arabia is not mentioned. Refer to the country of the winning club. You make unreasonable objections and expect me to spend more time based on your attitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MHcc20 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91: UEFA Euro 2028 Must be the United Kingdom and Ireland only to abbreviate. --Patcha007 (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use talk page at the article, not here. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91: OK --Patcha007 (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The source you used for international goals differs from my source (Soccerway.com). Is your source considered to be more authoritative?

22:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Even Soccerway says 22 caps / 1 goal, just like every other source, where did you even get 25 from ? Snowflake91 (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Snowflake91, I have a question regarding Suwon Samsung Bluewings' relegation. I'm a relatively new soccer fan, so there are gaps in my understanding of how K League works. My question is, does Suwon Samsung Bluewings' relegation take immediate effect? That is to say, should all the current squad be added to Category:K League 2 players if they are not already categorized as such? ✗plicit 12:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: The team is relegated to the second division for the 2024 season as they finished in the last place, this is official. Regarding players, you should not add K League 2 players categories right away, because we don't know which players will stay with the team for the 2024 season - the player needs to made at least one appearance in the K League 2 to be put into this category. And those categories are permanent and not for the current season only, so do not remove "K League 1 players" from any of the Suwon players, if the player made at least one appearance in K League 1 at any time in his career it should still be in this category. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the valuable information, I'll keep on eye out for the next season. ✗plicit 13:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the editor for 60 hours. JBW (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I understand on your intention to keep it simple (Hence you revert my edit), but there's a need for a clarity as well. You can see at the bottom part of the AFC Champions League page on the AFC website and it's clear that they separate those sponsors, and at least in the Konami announcement the AFC mention them as "Official Supporter"

It is what it is, so I put them back. Thank you. MArvAlcao17 (talk) 06:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snowflake91: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 2405:3800:893:F1A4:7083:35FF:FEB7:ECD8 (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2405:3800:893:F1A4:7083:35FF:FEB7:ECD8 (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pinging me at WP:AIV. By the time I saw your message, the new sockpuppet had already been blocked, but that is obviously not enough, so I took a few more steps, including semi-protecting the articles, and extending the partial block to cover editing by accounts, not just anon-editing. (I intended to do that originally, and leaving it at anon-only was a mistake.) Naturally, please feel welcome to contact me again if you see more from the same person. I am willing to consider other blocks and protections if necessary, but I would like to keep a total IP range block in reserve if really necessary, to minimise collateral damage. JBW (talk) 17:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Thanks for all the help, here is just one more account – Fukuokakawa (talk · contribs), it was registered last week and is now close to having 10 edits, so he *might* use this account to edit protected articles due to having autoconfirmed status, so better to block it in advance. Snowflake91 (talk) 19:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have noticed, I have blocked that account, but I waited until it actually became autoconfirmed. I was also keeping a watch on the affected articles, but since you are clearly much more in touch with them than I am, I've decided it makes more sense for me to leave them, on the understanding that you can contact me about any problems if you think it a good idea to do so. JBW (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: He is back, the account was registered almost immediately after the previous account was blocked on 28 December, see Samurainippon00 (talk · contribs). 14:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article Suwon FC, you manually reverted the edits of adding both Pratama Arhan and Josepablo Monreal, with the reason as "rv". Please explain in detail what it means. JoshuaInWiki (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see at the official FIS results is promoting it as Tauplitz/Bad Mitterndorf, because the hill is located at "no one's" land, between both settlements. I don't know why would you oppose that? Sportomanokin (talk) 11:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its true that it says "Tauplitz/Bad Mitterndorf" because thats probably how they brand the competition, while the official address of the competition at FIS website says "Furt 75, 8982 Furt, Bad Mitterndorf", so its not really "no one's land", the entire area is part of the Bad Mitterndorf. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to know why the image of Gimcheon Stadium that I added in the stadium article was reverted, and on the German Wikipedia itself, the stadium article has the image, why? Jose the Engine (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot insert the image like this obviously, it needs to be in infobox. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there is no infobox Jose the Engine (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:FC_Barcelona DrakeXper (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Talking about another new sponsor, I know We don't have the official announcement, yet. But it's the AFC who put those "Visit Saudi" advertising, not me.

I could even put the "OleOle Sport" but it's kind of a mysterious entity, so I didn't put that.

You're welcome. MArvAlcao17 (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I know We don't have the official announcement, yet" - exactly, and we won't add anyting until they announce it. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did they put that? Similiar to "Visit Qatar" sponsorship in the UEFA National Team competitions (Including Euro 2024), yet the UEFA didn't even bother to annouce it. MArvAlcao17 (talk) 12:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know? Mail them and ask or something, maybe its just a team-related sponsorship and not AFC sponsorship. Snowflake91 (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Visit Saudi" appears in all sides of advertising hoardings in all of the West Asia matches, but none of them in East Asia matches. MArvAlcao17 (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's now been listed on the AFC website, weirdly as a "Global Partner" MArvAlcao17 (talk) 14:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today Žan Benedičič made his debut in A lyga.A lyga online -- Makenzis (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and the match is not finished yet, do not add caps/goals when the match is still in progress. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was just wondering why my edit on the Kia Tigers' mascot was undid.

Thanks! Smartypants327 (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA considers both the Czech Republic and Slovakia to be successors to Czechoslovakia. For example, Czechoslovakia qualified for two U-20 World Cups and 6 U-21 Euros, so the first six goes to both. Furthermore, the tallies of independent Czech Republic and Slovakia are added with 6 Czechoslovak appearances together to get the final tally of each. Khoa41860 (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Khoa41860: Where is the source for FIFA then? Where is the source that U21 national team inherited Czechoslovak records, this is not mentioned anywhere yet you added it to the UEFA European Under-21 Championship article. And as I said, there cannot be 9 different teams reaching the quarter-finals in a single edition as this would break entire logic in the table. And by the way, that uefa.com news reports are usually written by local correspondents directly related to the country in the article, so this does not represent the official UEFA's view of the matter. UEFA links are also very conflicting, see this article from 2017, it says "Slovakia's sole previous U21 finals appearance was in 2000, when they came fourth on home soil", so it was their only second appearance in 2017. And by the way, why did you did this problematic edits at several articles while being logged-out? Snowflake91 (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried no citations, but when I logged in I put in citations. 2600:1700:B0A1:5F0:347C:CE4A:B290:7A2A (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ie. transfer rumours on club handball pages - it is a common practice for substantiated rumours to appear on the transfer sections here on Wikipedia. Any rumours must include a question mark to ensure they are not taken as confirmed. I have corrected the format of the Alex Bognar transfer once again for now - please do not revert this change. Williehuggies (talk) 13:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we absolutely do NOT post any kind of rumours on Wikipedia since this is an encylopedia and not a yellow live transfers website. "Any rumours must include a question mark to ensure they are not taken as confirmed" – I've never seen bullshit like that before, anyone who set this as "consensus" (and there is no and will never be any kind of consensus like that) should have been banned immediately for blatantly violating one of the core rules of Wikipedia, like posting only officially confirmed, verificated and sourced material. See WP:RUMOUR, there is nothing more to say. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw your recent contributions on Slovenian footballer pages and you were certainly referring to my edits.

You broke references on articles and cannot even see the big red warning at the bottom of the page.

I've been trying to clean up football-related articles for years, and I'm aware of those. You may not know this, but I'm currently editing on my IPAD, not laptop anymore due to Wi-Fi connection problems on the latter device. For this reason, mistakes may constantly happen with my fingers, that I realize there are ones like the big red warning like you said.

Either change all references (UEFA, Siol, RTV Slovenija, etc.) across the article or don't change anything, and not that you change it in just 2 sections and then you have multiple formatting of the same websites

I'm also aware per this statement. However, certain organizations like FIFA and UEFA are proper acronyms, so we better written in all-uppercase... that's why I constantly changed from "fifa.com" to FIFA for example.

How the h3ll are BBC, RTV Slovenia, and Slovenian Press Agency primary sources?!

Of course those are secondary sources. Oops! I didn't mean to add "primary sources" tag, but my only concern on Nejc Skubic's article is that the page seems to lack enough in-depth significant coverage.

Other than those, my concern is language of references. What is with the "en" parameters in English-language ones? This is EN Wikipedia, so I think it's unnecessary. Using a variant of a language also looks redundant (e.g. "pt-PT" or "pt-BR" instead of simply "pt"), especially when it's only spoken in one country (e.g. "SL-SI" instead of simply "SL").

P.s. Sorry if my sentences make you confused. I hope you understand.

CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CuteDolphin712: I had a bad day when I made those edits, sorry if those edit summaries seems rude, I didn't mean it like that. It's fine if you change from "fifa.com" to FIFA, but then it needs to be done for every single FIFA (or UEFA) link in the article, not just a couple. Regarding languages templates - I usually use auto-fill tool for references with some manual adjustments, so the tool automatically inlcudes "SL-SI" or "EN". And English language ("in English") never actually appears in the references section anyway, even if you include "language=en" parameter, so techically its okay, it can be removed, but even if not it doesn't do any harm. Same with "last1" / "first1", this is also automatically added like that sometimes, don't know why, but the outcome is exactly the same, it doesn't display differently in any way so again it's not a big deal. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to message you regarding my edits about Behar Feta. The stats you provided (although based on some web sites) are incorrect and incomplete. The numbers I entered from the internal database from the Macedonian Football Federation (where all his club and NT caps have been registered). This database is of course closed for the Football Federation and selected journalists, its fine if you dont accept it as an open source but then the data you have entered is fully incorrect so Im not sure if it makes more sense to stick to them. I leave the decision up to you. Msb73505 (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Snowflake91,

Thank you for linking me with the WP:MOSFLAGS page. I think that the use of flags to denote where a team is from is useful, and seems to be common use in sports team articles - not just in handball.

Just looking at these two examples (2023–24 Chelsea F.C. season and THW Kiel), should the flags here be removed? It seems there is a disconnect between the articles themselves and WP:MOSFLAGS. I personally think it is much better to include the flags, but I have no interest in entering a petty editing war.

Thank you for contributions and thoughts, @williehuggies Williehuggies (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the country of the club is relevant in "transfers" section on handball clubs articles, with the same reason we don't include flags in infoboxes of football / handball / basketball etc. players, the flags are used only when the country of the club is actually important, like international competitions and matches and such. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Just wanted to notify you of this, seems you were active on similar discussions and AfDs but the Lewis Hamilton win list and other such lists are proposed for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Lewis Hamilton 159.242.125.170 (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, no one told you that you are responsible for that to do. You are who think you are the guard of that page.

Its not a must for you to do that. Maybe it would be better for more editors, at last we can do some new things on that page what you don't let.

Anyway its a basic prinziple here that you should not handle the page as yours. I think you know it. Pressburg10 (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why did u reverted just edit the logo into black text the other info is good, 24 teams? League stage? And others such as the name and abbreviation bro I'm trying to make a contribution using my phone my only problem is how can i rename the page into AFC Champions League Elite because it is the new name for it and the text of the logo is white and i know it is wrong so that's the only problem i had in wikipedia editing, and the other information are good why did you reverted it? Cristiano santino (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snowflake91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2024 Malaysia A2 Amateur League for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want 2024 Malaysia A2 Amateur League to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, on the website of Krim there is the source article with huge letters that "Barabar Lazovic will end her sporting career" - the title is literally, in eglish.

Why do you delete it, that she will retire? There is the source for that. Pressburg10 (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask you do NOT put into the article the mislead information? As you may know neither Russia nor Serbia played in any EURO finals. Ta, --Пыисдін (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asia League Ice Hockey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I found an error on the above list. It says 313 wins it should be 314. I went through everything as there was one win missing. can you update this page please  ?. Regards 92.251.152.234 (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The note at the page says "This number is 1 less than the sum of the numbers in the next column: the 1957 British GP was won by Stirling Moss and Tony Brooks in a shared drive, so while it counts as 1 win for each driver, it only counts as 1 win for the UK" Snowflake91 (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, you are correct of course I never looked at the nationalities of the shared drive wins. Thank you 92.251.152.234 (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I do not see any note on the page pointing that out, was it removed by any chance ?. Thanks 92.251.152.234 (talk) 12:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a hidden note that can be seen only while you attempt to edit the source code, see WP:HIDDEN Snowflake91 (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi do you think it should be visable for all to see ?. regards 92.251.152.234 (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted to add career club statistics, accurate as of Soccerway on the 18th September 2024. Not entirely sure why this was reverted. Eog23 (talk) 22:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use proper formatting then, like do not add empty spaces before the new section or empty spaces after the new section, do not use capitalized letters when they should not be used ("Career total" and not "Career Total", "Career statistics" and not "Career Statistics" etc.), do not use "—" if the player didn't make any appearances in that competition - it should be "0/0", while "—" is used only if the club didn't even play in that competition during that season. For seasons, use ndash (–), so "2023–24" and not "2023-24". And also do not use double Soccerway sources, if that reference is already used within the article you should use "ref name" template instead. Not to mention that the stats you inserted were wrong, because post-season promotion playoff matches are not inserted under "League" but should be in "Other" column, don't you see that the stats you inserted didn't match the correct numbers in infobox? See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics for correct formatting. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you could clarify why the history of team captains was removed in Busan KCC Egis? I believe it's an important part of the team's history, especially considering how the captains contribute to the team's results and honors. Since this information is also featured on the official KCC Egis website, it seems like the team itself values its inclusion. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jenynfur (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will their official announcement on Facebook pages will work?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid Prayag (talk • contribs) 15:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]