User talk:Skyhighway

welcome

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roma Province of Northeastern Hungary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roma Province of Northeastern Hungary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Norden1990 (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Skyhighway,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Discrimination of Romani people in Hungary for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Jorm (talk) 20:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indef for WP:NOTTHERE and WP:CIR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked your account indef, because during the short period you have contributed to the English Wikipedia you were engaged into copyright violations, edit-warring, POV pushing, but you have not demonstrated an ability to create useful content and to communicate efficiently. This seals the deal for me. If you want to contribute, please try to convince uninvolved administrators via unblock requests that you are capable of contributing here without violating our fundamental policies.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the whole thread, for the benefit of the reviewers: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Violating WP:Civility, WP:NPA, beginning WP:HA--Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Short? It's from 2013. Skyhighway (talk) 10:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Short. Fewer than 100 edits. Only about 50 from four days in 2013, then nothing until June of this year. —C.Fred (talk) 17:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skyhighway (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have an account since 2013. The Admin who blocked me indef said 'short period of contribution'. By blocking me he only support Nationalist and Xenophobic push POV of some Hungarian users who just lamed at ANI. I want to be unblocked because I contributed and introduced NPOV to the article, you can check my whole history. Thank you.Skyhighway (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on Template:Motorways in Romania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]