User talk:Shubhanshut777

Hello, Shubhanshut777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page JDiggz did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Tacyarg (talk) 21:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tacyarg! Thank you for your feedback and the warm welcome. I appreciate you taking the time to point out the issues with my recent edits to the JDiggz page. I’ll make sure to review Wikipedia’s verifiability policy and the guidelines on citing reliable sources to improve my contributions. I’m committed to ensuring that all future edits adhere to the standards set by Wikipedia.

If there’s anything specific about my edits that needs immediate attention or improvement, I would appreciate any further advice or guidance. Thanks again for your understanding and support!

Best regards,

Shubhanshu Shubhanshut777 (talk) 10:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your reply. I took a quick look at your last three edits and removed an external link from Bowls; external links should not usually be in the body of articles, but in an external links section at the end. They need to meet the criteria in external links that can be included, also. No other issues - thanks for contributing, and best wishes. Tacyarg (talk) 10:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! I appreciate you taking the time to review the edits and making the necessary changes. I'll make sure to follow the guidelines for external links in the future. Best wishes to you as well! Shubhanshut777 (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do bold and the beautiful and the young Lewises write stories that have similarities? Yes they may be different, but they are so similar in the storylines. I wish that day did not write both of the stories with similar story lines.. 100.16.182.249 (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve noticed this too! The Bold and the Beautiful and The Young and the Restless definitely seem to share a lot of similar storylines, especially when it comes to love triangles and family drama. It’s like they follow the same formula sometimes. I get that they’re from the same creator, but I also wish they would make each show more unique so the plots didn’t feel so repetitive. It would keep things a lot more fresh and exciting for fans of both soaps! Shubhanshut777 (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 11:45, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any oversight on my part. My intention was to add correct citations to support the content, not to promote any personal or affiliated websites. I appreciate guidance and will focus on making edits that enhance the article's quality without including inappropriate links. If necessary, I will discuss any relevant citations on the associated talk page moving forward. Shubhanshut777 (talk) 12:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Alexf(talk) 13:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]