User talk:Salamuddin.Shaikh89

Hello, Salamuddin.Shaikh89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as D Design Studio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Randor1980 (talk•contributions) 13:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on D Design Studio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randor1980 (talk•contributions) 13:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to United Kingdom employment equality law because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salamuddin.Shaikh89/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prophet Yousuf (a.s) film may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Infobox film
• | language=[[English]] & {Persian language|Persian]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Occults. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zakir Naik because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Occults (talk) 12:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for creating Prophet Yousuf (a.s) film. Unfortunately, a similar article already exists at Yousuf-e Payambar. Feel free to contribute to that page. Thanks. — Wyliepedia 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Reify-tech. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Basement waterproofing, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 18:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Insulation (list of insulation material). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Reify-tech (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You spammed the same llnk into:

• Radiant barrier in this dif, and a copyvio image as well.
• Pipe insulation in this dif
• Waterproofing in this dif
• Basement waterproofing in this dif,

all of which have been reverted. Please STOP. Jytdog (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this dif to Stem cell. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I am going to check in on your contributions from time to time and if you continue this I will take action to have you blocked or banned. Jytdog (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Salamuddin.Shaikh89. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Salamuddin.Shaikh89/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KohraM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KohraM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 13:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]