User talk:Rex User

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rex User! I am Pharaoh of the Wizards and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to "Alfred Gingold" as requested.Please let me know if you need help.Great work.Please keep it up.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article came to my attention because the subject of the article contacted OTRS about some inaccuracies.

I deleted the page as it failed to assert why the subject qualified for an encyclopedia entry. You are free to recreate it with the proper assertion, I can email you the content of the deleted page if you'd like.

I've suggested to the subject that they correspond with you directly about any issues and mentioned that we'd prefer any facts to be verifiable from 3rd party reliable sources.

--Versageek 20:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll make sure to double-check my sources next time. I'll try to find some more reliable sites and re-write if and when I can. Thanks! Rex User (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cornelia Nixon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Cannot find multiple non-trivial mentions in independent, reliable sources to support notability, despite claims in article. Awards are not "major national awards"; fails WP:PROFESSOR and WP:CREATIVE.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Somno (talk) 04:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style. You're using too many capital letters.

Correct: External links, Selected bibliography, Professional career

Incorrect: External Links, Selected Bibliography, Professional Career

Michael Hardy (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you created Madeleine Bemelmans, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on College Green Magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rex User! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 414 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Norman Garbo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Irvin Faust - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Dennis McFarland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Christopher Hope - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. William McPherson (critic) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Cornelia Nixon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Magda Bogin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barrington Boardman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrington Boardman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 23:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]