User talk:Mangoflies

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
17		Mustapha Khalid Palash (talk)	Add sources
16		Root carving (talk)	Add sources
67		Renewable Energy Certificate (United States) (talk)	Add sources
195		Mockup (talk)	Add sources
103		Shot peening (talk)	Add sources
1,105		Computer-aided design (talk)	Add sources
15		Financial incentives for photovoltaics (talk)	Cleanup
21		Lakhan Thapa (talk)	Cleanup
374		Oxy-fuel welding and cutting (talk)	Cleanup
4		Tobago United F.C. (talk)	Expand
11		Blue Hills Ski Area (talk)	Expand
1,532		Rich Communication Services (talk)	Expand
191		Telephone numbers in Hong Kong (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
584		Social psychology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
343		Lost television broadcast (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
356		Fatigue (material) (talk)	Merge
7,734		Kennedy family (talk)	Merge
966		Idly Kadai (talk)	Merge
1,112		Theory of mind (talk)	Wikify
19		Renewable portfolio standards in the United States (talk)	Wikify
62		Solar power in California (talk)	Wikify
4		And Then Came Fall (talk)	Orphan
4		Abdur Rahim Popalzai (talk)	Orphan
2		Abdulrasaq Wuraola (talk)	Orphan
3		Shanghai University station (talk)	Stub
5		Brown's Inlet (talk)	Stub
3		Elio Augusto Di Carlo (talk)	Stub
4		Secondary polynomials (talk)	Stub
5		DC/Wildstorm: DreamWar (talk)	Stub
31		Walnut Hills, Cincinnati (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It is very strange to cite an article on the school being sued, and only mention from the article that celebrities are involved with the school. This strongly suggests the writer had no interest in writing a neutral article summarising secondary sources, which is the purpose of Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curtis School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangoflies! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard 🗨 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Referencing for beginners on how to format references. Refs should not be just URLs. A good approach is to create refs in your Sandbox, only copying into a draft or article when satisfied with the format. David notMD (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangoflies! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Feedback on draft article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:42, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangoflies! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Nothing to write about, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Middle Eastern Airlines Flight 444 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 21:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]