User talk:La Pianista/Archive 18

User	Talk	Humor	Userboxen	Guestbook	Contributions	Adoptee classroom	Bling	Sandbox

Instruction creep

Please assume good faith. If any of my edits have seemed unconstructive, please keep a cool head and notify me of my mistakes promptly. I try to be helpful and if I cause a problem, it is purely accidental; in no way are my edits meant to be offensive to anyone. Besides myself. Please sign your posts. Sign with four tildes to record your username and timestamp. Sinebot is watching, you know. Respond to all messages at the place where the discussion began. Meaning, if I post a message on your talk page, respond to it there, and if you post on my talk page, I will respond to it here, unless you specify otherwise. Nonsense gladly accepted. I like receiving messages, and I promise not to bite. Even if you think your questions are trivial, they may not be, at least to me. :) Place all new messages at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the link below will do this automatically for you. My page is constantly being monitored by dedicated talk page stalkers. Some of them (I probably don't know them all) are The ed17, IceUnshattered, Juliancolton, Nutiketaiel, Sonia, and Little Mountain 5 off the top of my head. Most of the time they lurk in the dark, but some of them might respond to your comments before I do. Don't be alarmed though; they might provide you with better responses than I can. Email me if the matter is confidential. But please include the word "Wikipedia" in the e-mail title so that I won't inadvertently delete it or have my spam-eater destroy it. Start a new topic by clicking here

		- Jameson L. Tai's Guestbook Barnstar
		For signing my guestbook - I, - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs, hereby present La Pianista with this award. Cheers! -- - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 05:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...lemme see - you sent this to someone who voted to delete you. Is this...? *proceeds to check for anthrax* —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But deleting is only half the fun! :D - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 05:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I suppose the other half is...payback?

Jk - thanks bunches for that. :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it is... I'm not letting that comment ruin the master plan... :D hahahahhaahah - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 06:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was just MEAN! Holy cow...(though it was a very nice counter-punch...) :D —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But it felt great! Fun aside, I've always thought the wiki needed a little room to breathe...hope that scared the 'crat out of him! :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, he is now winning, if only because Calvin and Hobbes is freakin' amazing. —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. Keep refreshing your watchlist every five seconds - you'll catch more. ;) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7590%. —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 18:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-_-

I stand corrected... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 19:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

o_O Reading the whole Pianista-Biblio exchange kind of blew my little childish mind, I think... IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What, did you decide to click the links? :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 22:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of them, but the ones I did... -shudders- Spare me! I beg of you! ♫ IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thou innocent unknowing... :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(oh, the colons, they shall destroy me in the end...) Shall I bang my head against my (school) computer again and die of of internal bleeding yet again? Oh, oh...the pain...I shall throw myself into the paradise of Heaven... -laughs- Anyways, when I started reading it, I totally didn't understand it...I wish I never did under stand it. -vomits- ♫ IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 19:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We all have to find out someday... :D —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 23:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Best to delay it as much as possible, though :\ ♫ IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 23:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"InnocenceShattered"? —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 23:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a "Lol!" moment. Meh, health class already did that >.>, but I have a habit of erasing painful memories...such as the ones created in health class... >.> ♫ IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 23:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Tis simply the cycle of life, my friend - we were all created somehow...

...Though albeit a somewhat disgusting subject for the young'uns, I see. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icy, tell me what you think of Pianista after reading the "CONFESHONZ!" section below. :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 23:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will comment there. ♫ IceUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 00:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eliciting a third-party response for a dispute you can easily handle yourself? So last year... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I peer reviewed Brad Pitt--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This will sound blunt, and I really mean it nicer than it sounds, but...

...PR's are supposed to give the article's major contributors constructive criticism. Telling them that the article is great is helpful, but only telling them that does not help. Are there any MoS errors in it? Any refs that are not formatted right? Are there any statements that are lacking references? Etc., etc., etc...—Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Eddie, that was very helpful. Weird...

Yes, WWW, Ed's right. I think your peer reviews have to be more detailed, getting into the small things like the amount/validity of references, overall style, and others. Perhaps I should have let you read WP:MOS and WP:FA?. Could you read them now, or at least skim through them?

Also, it would be better if you listed the peer review at the peer review page, here. There is a link to it on the talk page, which I think you've missed. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah- my sister warned me about that stuff, and I'm going to try to start editing again. Thanks! ~ California Girl 21:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear. :) Keep it up, now. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 21:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the gnoming on Briolette of India.

Chamal ^talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

No cats, cheezburgrs etc ;) Just an old-fashioned cookie. Chamal ^talk 00:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, Chamal, thanks! I didn't need that...the gnoming experience is enough of a reward for mey. But thanks muchly, anyways. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duuude, you have your own {{tb}}? So enviable... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I hope you don't mind but I've stolen your HTML for the flashing status bar at the top and made a small adjustment. Thanks. Ollie Fury _Contribs 01:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! No prob, Ollie. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]