User talk:KylieTastic

It is approximately 9:19 AM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).

If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 1,274 pending submissions

Archives

2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I have cited Raj era sources in the article, with proper disclaimer, is it correct. Please Check the article. Tizzythewhale (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about the comment about "Raj era sources" and WP:RAJ. I have not been aware of WP:RAJ before as it is not an area I generally edit. I note it is a Wikipedia essay rather than a policy: sometimes essays are clear and correct explanations of the current consensus other times more individuals opinions. As I'm not familiar with the topic area or essays creator I can't really comment. I would suggest either asking the editor who made the comment (Bonadea) or ask in a more general forum such as the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get possible input from lots of experienced editors some who should be familiar with this topic area. Other than the Wikipedia:Teahouse I guess Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics would be a good place to find people more familiar with the subject and best suited to give advice. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing my revisions. I am Woodys relative Highgateboy (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Highgateboy yes so you have an undisclosed WP:Conflict of interest. Wikipedia articles are written with independent reliable sources not by subjects or people who know them. KylieTastic (talk) 22:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you declined my article draft submission for creation. I would love to know what to do in order to make it approved in terms of adding significances. I have a couple of facts I am thinking of adding, but I don’t know if they are enough to make this article set for approval. If you could either explain to me what to add to improve my article or contribute to it to fix what needs improvement, I would be more than grateful. Thanks! Have a good night. Musicbladesuitbox (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Musicbladesuitbox, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). In this case also see Wikipedia:Notability (music). Your article Draft:King Sis has two sources both are interviews which are not an independent reliable sources so do not help show any notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Could you please do me a favour and search for sources that are genuinely reliable by Wikipedia guidelines? I’d be happy to accept edits from anyone at anytime, with an exception being vandalism, of course :) Musicbladesuitbox (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have my own lists of hundreds of articles to work on as well as reviewing submissions. I also just noticed that it has recently been deleted by AfD see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Sis so people already looked for sources and failed to find enough. Maybe just WP:TOOSOON for this subject. KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't deleted at AfD; it was speedy deleted, so the AfD never completed.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, opps! Thanks for the spot and clarification. KylieTastic (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KylieTastic. You have new messages at Banaticus's talk page.
Message added 23:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I have worked hard to compile a biography of an author, Abid Ali Mir, who has been featured in over 8 news media channels. However, the article was rejected without any in-depth research or consideration. I believe this deserves a closer review to ensure accuracy and fairness. Avinycomm (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is pure promotion, the same as when it was Draft:Abid Ali Kashmiri from you wit the account you are not block evading. Wikipedia is not for you to promote (yourself). KylieTastic (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KylieTastic. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 22:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Elli — Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]