User talk:Hh1718

Hi Hh1718! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Hh1718! Thank you for your contributions.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hh1718,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 00:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know I had asked about receiving a peer review but if you're potentially interested in giving a review, one was just requested for Talk:Spanish Civil War. FYI :) czar 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Czar, thanks for the invitation, it is always nice to learn someone thinks I might be of some use. 1) when it comes to Anarchism, I know close to nothing and can hardly contribute. I wrote the piece on 1936 coup attempt in Catalonia because I got interested in the episode itself, especially that there was little I combed out of the web, so following 4 days search I gathered enough info to feel that maybe I can write a dedicated piece myself; 2) as to peer reviewing of the Spanish-Civil-War-related articles, frankly speaking, I have no guts to try. I find engaging in editorial debates on WP emotionally exhausting and my wife even says I am getting nasty afterwards. I do WP stuff in my free time and I try to approach it as a pleasure. I have great admiration for people who do competent peer reviews just for the sake of improving the entries written by someone else, not to advance any specific agenda, but I am afraid I lack many features to enter this category. Regards, --Hh1718 (talk) 15:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you and no worries. It sounds like you've had a few bad disputes so far—sorry to hear that. While I too prefer to write articles in isolation, I've also found interaction with other editors over peer review to be rewarding. As a focused collaboration, reviews are less tendentious than stewarding/watching articles, which tends towards disputes over inserting content. If you have any interest in the Civil War, no pressure but just wanted to send my encouragement. Wikipedia is built by bold amateurs working in their spare time so no advanced expertise required and experienced editors know to be patient. See you around, czar 16:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Very nice work on Jakšto Street, superinteresting. I'd highly recommend you to nominate it at T:TDYK. The only change I'd suggest is to switch Cyrillic alphabet into parenthesis and use transliteration in italics in main text. -- Soman (talk) 13:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Soman, glad you liked it. As to your suggestions: 1) no, I'd prefer not to get my articles splashed or flagged on WP front page. You see, I suspect it would trigger lots of corrections and improvements by people who have never heard of Jakšto Street. I would prefer that the article is visited by people who have some genuine interest in the topic; 2) I am not sure what the WP rule about using Cyrillic names in English-language WP is. If it is recommended they get transliterated, I would be happy to comply. Otherwise, I have a vague sense that using Cyrillic adds the feel-and-touch and some local flavor, especially that I use also German, Lithuanian and Polish names. regards,--Hh1718 (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Per the message you left at AFC/R, I've moved Fall of Barcelona (1939) to Fall of Barcelona. Thanks for writing such a great article! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can request that an article be moved to another name with the WP:Requested moves process. That would move the "(1939)" page to the page without the parenthetical disambiguator. Typically, this would involve opening a new topic section on the relevant talk page (such as Talk:Fall of Barcelona (1939) and then {{subst:Requested move|Fall of Barcelona|reason why this article should be renamed}} and pressing save without having a section header (it gets autogenerated with the subst-template) -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• FWIW, WP:Village pump (miscellaneous), WP:Helpdesk and WP:Teahouse, can also provide you with instructions on how to proceed. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eejit43 and dear 65.92.247.66, thanks for your help. I am not entirely sure I like dropping "(1939)" from the title of this entry. You see, I intended the title of "Fall of Barcelona (1939)" with a view of potential future articles on other falls of Barcelona, e.g. in 1714 or 1808. For the time being "Fall of Barcelona" is OK, but once some good soul bothers to release an entry "Fall of Barcelona (1714)" there might be a need to change the title. regards,--Hh1718 (talk) 07:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! As of right now, per the naming conventions, the disambiguator is unnecessary. If those other articles are created, then if there is no primary topic we can disambiguate between those titles. In the meantime, feel free to add a hatnote to the article pointing to other targets. Thanks! : ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]