User talk:GreenBayPackersfan09

Hello, GreenBayPackersfan09! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Daniel Clark (actor) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/bclucky).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Daniel Clark (actor). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Categories must be supported by article content and that content needs references in bio articles NrDg 19:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of Malcolm in the Middle characters. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brian Kubach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zack Bennett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: most significant role was in an non-notble production. No independent sources, only source is site for non-notable web series.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Brian Kubach: "Note that this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon." - SummerPhD (talk) 18:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. GreenBayPackersfan09 (talk) 19:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case this is deleted before you get to read it:

It seems the other time it was created he didn't have any sources and it didn't look like he had any notable roles. But when I created it, it is better and the article is now well sourced, and has sources for the films he stars. Per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions. He apparently starred in a 2007 film named Fanboy. [1] And he appeared in 3 episodes of Wizards of Waverly Place, a notable television series, which he had a recurring role, which I think makes him notable. Plus he appeared in other films and tv shows, and has notable roles in Stamped!, Cheerleader Massacre 2, and had a supporting role in Fuel. [2] And, the article has sources to back it up. I think this time notability has been asserted. GreenBayPackersfan09 (talk) 19:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's look at those sources:

1. Flixter is a mirror of this page. So we're using this article as a source for itself. Certainly NOT a reliable source.
2. homepage.mac.com the homepage for the non-notable film lists its cast. Certainly not a sign of notability.
3. Wizards of Waverly Place Wiki. A wiki = NOT a reliable source.
4. IMDb. Not a reliable source, as you've been told numerous times (under various names).

Now, those "notable" roles:

1. Fanboy is not a notable production. Nothing associated with it is notable as a result of being associated with it.
2. Wizards of Waverly Place was discussed in the AfD.
3. "Other films and TV shows". Stamped!, Cheerleader Massacre 2 and Fuel are also not notable productions. If he stars in 20,000 non-notable productions, it does nothing for notability.

All of this was addressed. If this goes to a new AfD, you will need something new. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even though IMDB is unreliable, according to his official facebook page, [3], his IMDB page is his website, which would make it reliable. (I think) GreenBayPackersfan09 (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can establish that the facebook page actually is his, you would be able to demonstrate that he linked to IMDb, not that he considered it authoritative. IMDb can change any of the info on "his" website at any time. It is not "his" page. (If it were his page, it wouldn't be an "independent reliable source" anyway).

There are zero independent reliable sources here. This was, and still is, reason for deletion.

None of his roles are significant roles in notable productions. This was, and still is, reason for deletion.

SummerPhD (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the administrator who just deleted the article; I agree with User:SummerPhD's comments above that there doesn't seem to be any difference between what I saw and what was deleted earlier this month. My recommendation would be if you truly feel there is a case here for inclusion, you should take the article to WP:Deletion review. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Dan Benson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you, under your various names, love to give birth info for fictional characters, like Laurie Forman. "Kitty was impregnated with Laurie in October 1957, which would make her birthyear sometime in 1958." is not a source, it is an explanation for why you believe it to be true. First, it assumes the Oct. 1957 date, which is unsourced, then it reads into that date to extrapolate a birth date, which is synthesis. Until such time as I get around to having you blocked as yet another sock puppet, I will continue to revert this unsourced change. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Zack Bennett, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Bennett. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Dan Benson, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harry Shum Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP; most notable role is minor. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 04:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jarron Vosburg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarron Vosburg. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Shum Jr., has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Shum Jr.. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 23:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Alyson Stoner. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.[4] - SummerPhD (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to the Nick Jonas page. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you continue I will have to block you from editing.--Tweetsabird (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Simon Curtis (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 01:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Noah Reid. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nolan Gerard Funk. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Steve Belford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 16:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Untitled Nancy Meyers Project, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Nancy Meyers Project (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Devon Werkheiser, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought Bruce sounded like a dog's name there because of the movie's title, so I thought... - Zhang He (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sara Erikson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Most significant role is minor, no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jajube Mandiela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sara Erikson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Erikson. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 16:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Soren Fulton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 21:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Steve Belford, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is user edited. As a result it is not a reliable source. You have been told this repeatedly. Please stop. - 13:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

You have repeatedly ignored warnings about adding unsourced biographical information about living persons. You have repeatedly ignored warnings about creating articles about living persons without citing independent reliable sources. At this point, I would strongly encourage you to begin using talk pages -- on individual articles or user talk pages -- to discuss your edits and the concerns that have been raised about them. Your continued failure to do so will force me to begin wholesale deletion of the articles you have created and have you blocked. Thank you. - 13:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

The article Patrick Ryan Anderson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article A.J. Saudin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 14:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, A.J. Saudin, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.J. Saudin. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kendall Ryan Sanders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, no notable roles, no coverage in reliable sources. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jack Blessing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. No coverage in independent reliable sources provided or found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Hello, GreenBayPackersfan09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like wikipedia and decide to stay. I am sorry that there are so many impersonal warning messages on your talk page. There are many editors who feel that your hard work here is important and valuable, especially me. Need help? If you are looking for help, you can just type: {{helpme}} ...and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Or, please visit New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! If you have any questions at all, please message me. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry so many of your contributions are being deleted by a couple of editors. There are many editors who feel your contributions are important. Right now members of the WP:Article Rescue Squadron are working to save the article you created, Sara Erikson.

I would like to personally invite you to the squadron.

Hello, GreenBayPackersfan09. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Patrick Ryan Anderson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Ryan Anderson. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Patrick Ryan Anderson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Ryan Anderson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to New Boyz, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Manway (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is A.J. Saudin. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.J. Saudin. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jordan Hudyma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. Most notable role is minor. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anicka Haywood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. Most notable role is minor. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 11:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit because you accidentally put back a malware link to ez-tracks.com, and I wasn't able to figure out what parts of the article you were intentionally restoring.—Kww(talk) 21:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dibilcon11, I've tagged your userpage for speedy deletion per Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy. Please do not include details about your name, school, location, or age on your userpage if you create it again. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Anicka Haywood, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anicka Haywood. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 02:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that editing without logging in or under multiple user names to avoid sanctions is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies. If I begin to suspect that is happening, I will ask for an investigation under WP:SOCK. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you altered Daniel Clark's entry and described him as an "American born Canadian actor" as far as has been determined Clark is not, nor has he ever been a Canadian citizen, and he has always been an American citizen despite having been partially raised in Canada. If you revert this entry, I will assume that it is vandalism judging from your history.(75.69.241.91 (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hello GreenBayPackersfan09! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Kelsey Sanders - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Soren Fulton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Diego Klattenhoff - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Jack Blessing - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Ishan Dave - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Steve Belford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Evan Williams (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. David Walton (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Philipp Karner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Brendan Penny, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Penny. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. avs5221 (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Jajube Mandiela, an article that you created, and Sam Earle an article that you are a main contributor of, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Steele. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 117Avenue (talk) 04:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matthew Timmons. Since you had some involvement with the Matthew Timmons redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AussieLegend (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diego Klattenhoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENT (no obviously significant roles or cult following) and WP:GNG (no indication of significant coverage in independent reliable sources).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Blessing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Blessing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 02:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Steve Belford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evan Williams (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]