Jump to content

User talk:Germanicguard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Germanicguard! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Managing a conflict of interest at Brahma Chellaney and Debt-trap diplomacy

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Germanicguard. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Brahma Chellaney, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This also applies at Debt-trap diplomacy, a term invented by Chellaney. 180.231.230.38 (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brahma Chellaney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive is the term that applies to the editing of Ratnahastin, who seems to be pursuing a partisan political agenda on Wikipedia that leaves little space for objectivity.
Ideologically driven editing of Wikipedia pages, including distorting facts and defacing pages, indicates the work of a partisan hack. The last thing Wikipedia needs is a hired gun. Germanicguard (talk) 17:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Comment on content, not other editors. I suggest that you strikethrough the personal attacks you made. Schazjmd (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi Germanicguard! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Brahma Chellaney several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Brahma Chellaney, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. - Ratnahastin (talk) 17:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]