User talk:DBlomgren

Salut Vberger/Bel Adone,

J'ai une question. Oú est-ce que tu as trouvé l'information que Isiro a 200.000 habitants? Si c'est une page web, est-ce possible ajouter la référence? Si tu vois la page en anglais Isiro tu verras que j'ai trouvé un numéro de 150.000. (Je suis en train de contacter l'éditeur qui a écrit qu'il y avait 81.000) Merci!

DBlomgren 3 novembre 2006 à 07:03 (CET)

Hye

In fact, I don't remember. Probably on the University website, I will check it right now (they have a new website, I don't know if they changed the content).

But between 150,000 and 200,000, it is not so bad for DRC. Nobody has exact datas indeed for DRC. For Mbuji-Mayi for example, the stats are between 800,000 and 3,500,000 according to the sources (see fr:Discuter:Mbuji-Mayi)

Vberger 07:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's it : "more than 200,000 inhabitants" [1]

Vberger 07:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Wow, a university in Isiro... I hope they've paved some roads.

Hi, the figure for Isiro was from Emporis.com i think. However it is likely innacurate and out of date. I will remove it as the U.N figure is obviously more reliable Willy turner 18:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/ slashes / are for [[phoneme]s, [ brackets ] are for allophones. | pipes | are for morphological analysis. Ƶ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 22:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing your erudition. I thought I'd return the favor: [2]. Notice the comparative form. One point for moi! :) --Dblomgren 02:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! You got me! I suppose laxer is grammatical, it just sounds funny to me. Ƶ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 06:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I responded to your question at the Village Pump. It's always good to see another editor working on Africa topics. You might be interested in checking out Wikipedia:Africa-related regional notice board. Cheers, BanyanTree 03:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm checking it out now. So is that Pjeter Dungu info for real or shall I research it? --Dblomgren 04:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a Google search for "Dungu Albania" and that name popped up. Or rather "Pjetër Dungu". There's probably enough info for a stub on that first page of results if you're eager. - BanyanTree 04:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the disambiguation note on the Dungu page! And Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas to you as well. (It seemed silly to look at all the info on the Albanian guy and not go ahead and write the stub myself.) - BanyanTree 06:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banyan, I hope you're still tuned into my page. I think it's time to rename Dungu "Dungu, Democratic Republic of the Congo". I understand I should be able to click a move link to the left, but I don't see one. Help! --Dblomgren 04:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a move tab at the top of the screen. Cheers, BanyanTree 15:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to move the disambiguation page on top of Dungu, which you should be able to do if there is only one edit. - BanyanTree 21:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It had completely slipped my mind that a page deletion was required for my suggestion above. I've gone ahead and done this, and also removed your item from WP:RM. If you have any other uncontroversial admin-ish things that need doing in the future, feel free to drop me a line and I'll get to them when I next log in. Cheers, BanyanTree 00:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congolese music seems right. I'm no expert. Just an interested editor who happened upon the page. - AKeen 06:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dblomgren,

The original french page for Bangala Swadesh list is fr:Liste Swadesh du bangala. Feel free to complete it with the missing words, and to fix any errors. Thanks for your help. Croquant 09:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The english page has been moved recently to Wiktionary ([3]). So, if you want to modify the Swadesh list, please go to the Wiktionary version instead of my archive. I don't mind you modify the archive, but it's better to make changes in the encyclopedic page. Thanks. Croquant 11:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Neal,

Seems you should put a userbox saying "interested in parapsychology" on your user page. Anyhow, since you've voted, how about prefacing your vote with a big bold "Oxford" to make it easier to count?

Ciao,
DBlomgren 04:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated, thanks.--~Nealparr~ ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 14:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

1. For the maps, what you need to do is find an existing map of the area the Uele River goes through (preferably under a free license), paste it into some drawing software (I used Paint for the Guernsey and Jersey maps), then rub out any irrelevant detail on the map and go over with a pencil or paintbrush tool any lines that are too thin or faint.
2. As for the verbs, I'm no linguist but a problem you might encounter is where you would need to draw the line on which verbs are more or less common. If there is some official criteria (like a verb must be used at least x times in the last y years to be considered 'common') then you might want to mention that if you go ahead, but personally, I don't really know the subject that well. Tra (Talk) 02:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on my talk page:

I see on 216.101.58.15's talk page you have already blocked him. He has just vandalized Black light (and already undone by someone else). I see his user talk page is full of warnings, so I thought rather than warn him again, you could handle it in an appropriate manner, possibly by blocking again, which I can't do since I'm not an admin. Thanks.

Thanks for the message, and for keeping an eye out for vandalism.

Actually, I'm not an admin, either...just fairly active in trying to combat vandalism and spam around here. I was the last person to have warned 216.101.58.15 for vandalism, but I didn't actually block them.

I warned the user again, since that's in keeping with the WP policy for IP address accounts, which are potentially shared among users. Since it could be a different user with the IP address, and since it had been a while since the last vandal edit, we don't block the user right away. I usually give them a "test3" (now "uw-vandalism3") warning if the account previously had significant vandal activity. If they vandalize again soon, they'll get a final (test4/uw-vandalism4) warning, and then the next step is a block.

BTW, you don't have to be an admin to request a block. Just go to WP:AIV and add them to the list (instructions are on that page). Several admins are typically watching that list of problem users, and will block a user if that's appropriate.

Thanks again for the help. If you have any questions, just let me know.

--JFreeman ^(talk) 03:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very useful. Thank you for the prompt reply! --DBlomgren 04:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dblomgren,

This is Rich I answered your question about NVC.

You have been invited to join the WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Africa. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Belovedfreak 12:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you still working on that Hawthorne effect article? I was about to complain on the talk page how that there's way too much original research (even if it is referenced to an external article by a respected source) talking about what the effect may or may not be caused by -- the effect itself is what the article is about; only Mayo's and a few other important figures' discussion of possible mechanisms, applications, etc should be included. That is, the effect itself as a "defined" phenomena (including the fact that the definitions vary pretty widely), is at least a scholarly reference to the idiomatic 'observer effect' in social sciences. But WHY it happened, who knows, really? Imho, that is. I'm gonna leave this one alone tho, unless you msg my talk page that you've lost interest in it for some reason, then I'll take it up. But I don't want it. :) Eaglizard 01:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Greg,

Thanks for the kick in the butt about the Hawthorne Effect. My round tuit should arrive this weekend, so I'll get started. I do plan to include what other people think of it (to be called "Interpretation, criticism, and conclusions" - see the outline on the talk page), since I think it's fair to include published controversy. I look forward to your feedback and surgically precise editing. DBlomgren 20:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greg,

about your doubt about the pronounciation difference of ô and ó. Ô corresponds more or less to the o in the english "sole" and to the french word "eau" (IPA:o). Ó corresponds to the o in english "not" and french "sort" (IPA: ɔ). Congratulations for your effort. If need any thing more, please contact me at my page in the portuguese wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Japf (talk • contribs) 09:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've seen that you can speak Lingala and I want to ask you for help on that Wikipedia. Nowadays it's without people working there and, if you help translating some phrases, we can improve that Wikipedia. Could you help me there, please? --Jeneme (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HI thanks. I've been trying to add them to most African countries, most of the maps were created by me too. I don't think I've done all of DRC yet. Using them is simple. It would be great if you could copy them and adjust the details on other articles and help develop the articles by adding them. You can enter the coordinates in the infobox and the appropriate province or district easily ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 12:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Paul Hunt (gymnast) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ShootinPutin109 04:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Saw your comment at Talk:Kolkata. I've made a move request, if you would care to comment. — kwami (talk) 01:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola, DBlomgren! Estamos creando el capítulo Wikimedia Costa Rica, ¿te gustaría participar? Wikimedia Costa Rica (WM-CR) es una iniciativa para crear una asociación civil que promueva los proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia en Costa Rica. Buscamos personas comprometidas con Wikipedia u otros proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia para que se incorporen. Solo debes firmar en la lista de participantes, ¡y ya serás miembro! Nuestra misión es facultar y animar a la gente de todo el país a reunir y desarrollar contenido educativo neutral bajo una licencia de contenido libre o en el dominio público, y a difundirlo de manera efectiva. ¿Conoces a otro costarricense o residente de Costa Rica que pueda participar? Extiéndele esta misma invitación. Ah, y recuerda que para firmar debes colocar el código {{Sultool|TU-NOMBRE-DE-USUARIO}} Si deseas más información, puedes contactarnos: Luis Manuel Madrigal en Wikinoticias, coordinador general de WM-CR. Página de discusión en Meta-Wiki del futuro capítulo. Canal #wikimedia-cr en IRC (servidor Freenode). Notificaciones en Twitter. Página de usuario en Facebook. ¡Te esperamos! -- Allan J. Aguilar Castillo mantis@tormail.net

Hi. When you recently edited Langi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangala language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola, DBlomgren! En Wikimedia Costa Rica (WM-CR) estamos organizando una reunión qe involucre a los editores de los proyectos Wikimedia que residan en Costa Rica y a los miembros de este capítulo. El objetivo de la reunión es organizar las pautas del capítulo para que WM-CR sea eventualmente aprobado por la Fundación Wikimedia. Aún no hemos asignado una fecha ni un lugar de reunión, pero tenemos previsto que se realice en abril en San José. Si estás interesado y dispuesto a asistir, añade tu firma de usuario en la página de discusión del capítulo en Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Además, si no te has inscrito a WM-CR, añade tu nombre de usuario en la lista de miembros. Estamos conscientes de que pueden haber limitaciones espaciales o económicas. Si este es el caso, por favor comunícamelo por correo electrónico a <siglar@tormail.org> para asignarte un beca que incluya transporte, alimentación o estadía según sea necesario. Finalmente, para facilitar las comunicaciones entre los editores costarricense (incluyendo trámites de becas y notificaciones), te pedimos que nos envíes voluntariamente un número telefónico para contactarte y tu dirección de correo electrónico personal a <siglar@tormail.org>. Toda la información que envíes será siempre confidencial y se utilizará exclusivamente para la organización interna de WM-CR. Gracias por tu tiempo. Esperamos ansiosamente tu respuesta. — mantis [religiosa] — 18:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] siglar@tormail.org 4096R/BE3B1B2C siglar@jabber.ccc.de 7DE09C02 8FF24CA1 CD1523F7 1CB197FE 7EAEF27C Freenode: #wikimedia-crentrar siglar f7c195ac5410bdcc220f167e93b2dd7b211d5e80

Hello, please see the talk page for Ray Stevens. ----Design (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DBlomgren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DBlomgren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DBlomgren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DBlomgren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to make sure you were aware of this partial revert, so you won't be creating more instances that have to be fixed. There has been extensive community-level debate on the question and this is what was decided. Thanks. ―Mandruss ☎ 15:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed it. Thanks for letting me know. DBlomgren (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm declining this article for now, but! I think it has a lot of potential. The topic seems notable and I think there's enough to build a good page from this, it just needs to be edited.

First of all, the Wiemer vineyard website is not a reliable source and needs to be removed. Secondly, all of the uncited material needs to be removed.

The third part is probably the most time consuming. The page needs to be written in a more formal and informational tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermann J. Wiemer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 11:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DBlomgren! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 11:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann J. Wiemer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 03:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]