User talk:Cypella

Welcome to Wikipedia! There are a variety of ways to break up sections to highlight the differences. A simple blank line (which is what's now on Neofinetia) will put in a gap between the two sections. I've also added a few items to my sandbox showing other types of tables that will split up the sections. Feel free to copy the code from my sandbox and play around in your sandbox with it. :) -Niceguyedc ^{Go Huskies!} 10:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neofinetia falcata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm attempting to revive the Plant article COTM, and since you're a member of WikiProject Plants, you're being notified about this hopeful revival. Please feel free to propose articles for collaboration, and thanks for your consideration! Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current WikiProject Plants collaboration article is Carnivorous plant. Last month's collaboration was: (none). To propose future collaborations, please contribute here!

Unfortunately the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants is clear that "connecting terms", like "subsp." or "var.", should not be italicized. So instead of ''[[Hoya australis ssp. oramicola]]'' you need to use [[Hoya australis ssp. oramicola|''Hoya australis'' ssp. ''oramicola'']], which is rather tedious. :-( Peter coxhead (talk) 08:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed it is. That would make a great automated bot function though... Do you know anybody who writes them here? (Certainly not me ;) Cypella (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Get your scalpel out and go-to-town on that! I'd added a memo on the talk page too, and have been checking in occasionally since then (April?)... doesn't seem to have been any activity related to revising that article at all until you came along (and yet the article is still averaging around 40 hits per day). Do your worst, friend! Japanglish (talk) 02:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess our Talk page notes, followed by your sudden action, lit a fire under someone's axx and Spector's page has since been tended to and reborn! Much better than before; someone must've already been working on it because that was FAST! I'll chime in on the Mottainai article if I can get to it before a decision is made; no time at the immediate moment. There are so many English wikipedia articles covering Japanese non-attractions or paying far too much lip-service to undeserving subjects, and I'm all about putting them in their place; I'm a better critic than writer anyway and critics are a very necessary part of the wiki process (all about being fair where fairness is due though). Do let me know if I can be of help with anything else! Japanglish (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mic Bond - Across the View.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mic Bond - Across the View.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]